This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gisela Werbezirk article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
A fact from Gisela Werbezirk appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 July 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Austro-Hungarian actress Gisela Werbezirk claimed to receive up to 20 prank calls a day about her married name, Gisela Werbezirk Piffl?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago12 comments4 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
@Onegreatjoke: That's right, I need to do a QPQ. I knew I had to get this in today while it was within 7 days from creation. QPQ will be soon, thanks. In the meantime, the decision on which hook, if either, can be considered. Bungle(talk • contribs)19:33, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Onegreatjoke: As it seems you did the review, can you progress this as completed, or offer any other feedback, now the QPQ has since been done? I suggested 2 separate hooks initially for consideration. Bungle(talk • contribs)16:15, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Theleekycauldron: I understand the remark regarding ALT1, in that it was not an uncommon occurrence necessarily for Jewish people to be escaping persecution around this time, though unsure how rare it was for an established actor/actress to do so and continue their career elsewhere. The original hook I provided seemed to be somewhat amusing (not for the person of course) and had some reports in other news outlets about the pranking she received. It seemed fairly unusual/unique and I am willing to see if we can progress along those lines if you can suggest what needs to be changed or reconsidered? Bungle(talk • contribs)10:29, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Personally I think ALT0 is fine as-is, no need to quote directly. The hook already states that she "claimed to receive" such calls, so readers would attribute such claims to her. I also prefer ALT0 more than ALT1. Edge3 (talk) 16:03, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
I must confess so have forgotten about this a little, so apologies for this (and for not reacting sooner to theleekycauldron). I hope it's not gone beyond an acceptable time, but appreciate it's approaching 2 months since I raised this. If ALT0 is ok, can we run with that? Bungle(talk • contribs)19:17, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments2 people in discussion
@GiantSnowman: Just on a matter of curiosity, what was your thinking behind changing the date format to DMY? As someone from the UK, I personally prefer it (DMY) but I tend to use mdy if handling American subjects or where there isn't a clear indicator to use one over the other. This isn't an issue, just a matter of curiosity. Thanks. Bungle(talk • contribs)10:38, 2 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
@GiantSnowman: Well, she gained American citizenship and thus became "American" and was thus best known as such in her latter life, but as I say, I personally prefer DMY anyway. I was just curious why you felt it superseded in this instance (insofar as maybe being policy-based that I should be mindful of for other articles). Thanks. Bungle(talk • contribs)14:37, 2 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Sounds like that actually supports leaving the date format as MDY actually! Alas, if you consider DMY is more suitable, that is fine with me. Bungle(talk • contribs)15:04, 2 July 2023 (UTC)Reply