This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
This article is on a recent (Jan 2011) literary work (epic poem with 1000+ songs) by the well-known and award winning Sanskrit poet and author Jagadguru Rambhadracharya. The article is not an advert, there are other articles on the works by the same author like Sribhargavaraghaviyam and Ashtavakra (epic). I copy-edited and expanded it today, and I have tried to be NPOV without making it appear like an advert or promotion. It is still being written, and will be completed over the next 3-4 weeks with the relevant references and citations. I have removed the deletion tag added by User:Sitush. Please discuss if you still think it appears to be an advert, and I would be happy to address the concerns with the required actions. Nmisra (talk) 04:00, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
I didn't say that it was an advert but that it seemed to be one more than anything else. As a recently released work it needs citations rather more than it needs copyediting. Notability, which was my main point, is not inherited by the work just because its author is notable. If I were you, I would concentrate on the citations and then get back to copyediting. But that is just my opinion. - Sitush (talk) 04:03, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
In my opinion, there are enough citations for the current article. And the creator has promised to add more when he expands the article. So not a big issue. --Pawanvats2007 (talk) 11:40, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply