Contesting the speedy deletion tag: explanation:

edit

This article has been tagged for the speedy deletion because of the lack of content found in the same article. However, I would like to say that I am still researching for material, and this article should be edited and added with new content within a couple of hours. In the meantime, I am requesting for the article to be put on hold in the speedy deletion process.--Jmasini (talk) 17:22, 4 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have now added new information as well as one of the most reliable sources one can find: the official Gozo Diocese Website that confirms all the facts on the article. I will be adding new information as well as other sources tomorrow. Once again I appeal that the sd process should be halted or paused, especially now that a reliable source has been added.--Jmasini (talk) 17:22, 4 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have removed my nomination for deletion in light of the improvement in the article, in future consider using the {{underconstruction}} tag to avoid confusion.--UltraMagnus (talk) 19:24, 4 September 2009 (UTC)Reply