Talk:Glenelg tram line

Latest comment: 5 years ago by SCHolar44 in topic Page move completed

comment from 2006

edit

Wanted: Image of Flexity Classic Cab controls.Myrtone (the strict Australian wikipedian)(talk) Febuary 2006

Rigid-frame car length

edit

- H-class longer than e. g. Buffalo or Tuen Mun? Or among older cars, e. g. Sundsvall-Skönvik, Sweden No. 55 at 17.8 m. (over couplers? Not certain.)? I doubt it. Keinstein 12:18, 1 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Advertising

edit

I've removed the section regarding tram advertising again because a list of all past, present a future advertising on trams is:
1. Original Research
2. Not verifiable, there are no sources and there are likely to never be any usable sources.
3. Irrelevant to the article, to the tram's operations, history and future. Wikipedia is not a directory.
--AtD (talk) 03:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Glenelg tram. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:28, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Glenelg tram. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:38, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Please visit Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Adelaide#Trams if you are interested in discussing the structure and number of articles about Adelaide trams. --Scott Davis Talk 13:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hatnotes

edit

Copied from User talk:Bullgold14

Could you please not remove the hatnote links to the main tramcar articles? While they may not have detailed information on Adelaide (provided in the Glenelg tram article) they are still noteworthy as the primary outline for information and contain some technical details for the tram types. Regards. – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 03:40, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hatnotes are appropriate where there are more detailed articles beneath, e.g. the H class. The Adelaide section in the Flexity article is fairly useless, having no cites and being 5 years out of date. The Citadis article only makes brief mention in a table with little prose. So in both cases, this article is the more detailed and no reason to hatnote these when a standard wikilink is sufficient. Bullgold14 (talk) 00:48, 13 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Stops

edit

Other lines have listed the stops here, is this necessary for this article too?150.101.100.140 (talk) 05:29, 10 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Name of the article?

edit

Now that the Glenelg line is no longer the only tram line in Adelaide, Is it still appropriate to call this page "Glenelg Tram"? Shouldn't it be something like "Adelaide Tram lines" now? 36.255.48.99 (talk) 03:11, 15 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

"Glenelg tram" refers to the modern light rail system as a whole (the original Victoria to Moseley route plus the extensions). "Adelaide tram lines" refers to the historic tramcar system that ran throughout the suburbs. – Nick Mitchell 98talk 12:33, 8 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Major upgrade to this article

edit

Please see the discussion of pending major upgrades to this and other articles about trams in Adelaide, and two new articles, at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Adelaide#2019 upgrade of Adelaide trams articles. A change in the title to "Glenelg tram line" is proposed and a new article on Adelaide's tramways revival has been drafted. Comments welcome. SCHolar44 (talk) 23:15, 19 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Page move completed

edit

I have completed a page move in order to change the title to Glenelg tram line, South Australia, as forecast 3 months ago. The matter was also discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Adelaide.

The upgrading of the article, mentioned above, is almost finished. SCHolar44 (talk) 06:37, 24 May 2019 (UTC)Reply