Talk:Glenn Lazarus

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Mitch Ames in topic Image caption size

Independent Senator affiliated with PUP?

edit

... what's this supposed to mean? He's PUP, not independent. Timeshift (talk) 08:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Yeah. The Senate does not formally recognise a party until there are a minimum of five members. They can informally (and for media purposes) be known as PUP, but there will be no party status in the Senate. Parties get to have a 'leader', extra staffers, a party room, a set access to debates, number of Questions Without Notice, etc, hence the numerical limitation. Whether they are formally recorded as 'Independent' for purposes of Hansard, etc, may be subject to a determination at the time, eg, by a formal Senate motion following negotiation by party whips. However, for WP purposes, it might well be less confusing to simply identify him as PUP and just forget the Senate niceties. Cheers, Bjenks (talk) 09:30, 16 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
The Senate website doesn't apply this distinction (look at Meg Lees' official biography for an example, which has her party listed as the microparty she founded), so I don't think we should either. The Drover's Wife (talk) 13:15, 16 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
True, Lees's official Senate biog acknowledges her transitions from AD to Ind to Australian Progressive Alliance. My information did apply in the past but seems to have been superseded, as verified by the latest Odgers which states "A senator’s statement in the Senate that the senator is a member, a leader or office-holder of a political party is accepted for the purposes of recognition under the procedures." Allow me to fix up my error. Cheers, Bjenks (talk) 16:10, 16 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Phew! For a second there I thought we were going to have a crossbench full of indies come July :) Timeshift (talk) 01:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Glenn Lazarus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:34, 2 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Glenn Lazarus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:41, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Image caption size

edit

According to MOS:INFOBOX#Style, color and formatting:

General consistency should be aimed for across articles using the same infobox. A good guideline is not to add extraneous style formatting over that in a default infobox without good reason.

Thus I have again removed the extraneous <small> tags added by Theanonymousentry, because there is no good reason for the small text. Mitch Ames (talk) 07:22, 21 January 2017 (UTC)Reply