Archive 1

Raul Salinas

I don't think this is a reference to the right person. Raúl Salinas de Gortari was linked, and this makes doesn't make sense politically or geographically. floh (talk) 06:33, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

"Eight languages"?

The article stated that Anzaldúa writes with a "unique blend of eight languages, two variations of English and six of Spanish." However, linguistically speaking, such "variations" are not distinct languages; they are dialects. I've edited the page to reflect that. 128.223.223.101 (talk) 04:48, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Borderlands/La Frontera--isn't this her real legacy?

"She is perhaps most famous for coediting This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color (1981) with Cherríe Moraga, editing Making Face, Making Soul/Haciendo Caras: Creative and Critical Perspectives by Women of Color (1990), and coediting This Bridge We Call Home: Radical Visions for Transformation (2002)."

Really? I'm always hearing references to Borderlands/La Frontera, but didn't know how about these coedited books until looking at this page. 98.245.121.56 (talk) 16:37, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

I agree--I think Borderlands is her most famous work, although This Bridge... is a close second. Aristophanes68 (talk) 20:15, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
    ^^^I concur with this person 100%!, 04 Nov 2012

For Linguistic terrorism I totally agree with Gloria about people who gave up on their native language. SHe felt angry, and I would feel the same way because you should always have strong connections to your culture. She was always criticized by her parents when she spoke improper spanish, something I went through but with arabic. Great editings by the way!! Very interesting information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hamdighanim (talkcontribs) 06:49, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gloria E. Anzaldúa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Forgive me - only an occasional contributor - not sure how to report or reverse the damage to this page (likely targeted to coincide w/ Google doodle). Abusive changes are widespread. Juliannechat (talk) 04:54, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Immediately thereafter: that was fast! Impressive. Juliannechat (talk) 04:56, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Image

I'm about to boldly remove the image of her burial site. Someone pointed out that it appears that it was taken just after someone urinated on it, which doesn't seem appropriate to have here, especially on a day when the article is highest traffic. I looked for an alternative but have not found one yet. I don't think this was the fault of the photographer, who uploaded several other perfectly normal images. It's certainly possible it's not what it appears. It's an interesting question of at what point does a negative contextual element of an image outweighh the encyclopedic value. To me, such is the case here, but I don't know if there's precedent for it. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 19:27, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gloria E. Anzaldúa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gloria E. Anzaldúa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:11, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Ancestors

Is there additional published information about her family? The few published mentions are of her father Urbano and great-grandfather Urbano. Her grandfather David and grandmother Dolores, great-grandfather Urbano and great-grandmother Victoriana, and great-great-grandfather Juan are all listed as "white" on US censuses. I haven't seen a single male or female ancestor on her father's side who is listed as non-white. Given that both sides of her family owned ranches, were her ancestors slave owners? Maybe not Black slaves, but perhaps Native slaves? They were seemingly land owners and the descendants of prominent Spanish colonizers, so I would be surprised if they hadn't owned Native slaves at some point. But Anzaldúa has also talked about her family being poor and being migrant workers, so I assume that perhaps the family wealth was lost at some point, but I haven't seen anything in writing about that. Anzaldúa's mother Amalia García was the daughter of Rafael García and Ramona Dávila. Ramona is listed as "white" on the US census, as are both of Ramona's parents Vincente and Dolores, but I can't find anything for Rafael García. Anzaldúa's indigenous heritage is unclear. She either had legally white ancestors who were technically mixed/mestizo or maybe Rafael was of indigenous ancestry. It would be cool to find out which Indigenous peoples Gloria E. Anzaldúa has connections to. It would seem that Gloria's socially conservative family identified as white and didn't necessarily even identify as Mexican due their identification with whiteness and Americanness, from reading her essay "La Prieta" which discusses how her family subjected her to colorism/racism because her skin was darker than her light-skinned/white-skinned family members. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 01:31, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2018 and 13 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): James70q.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:28, 16 January 2022 (UTC)