Talk:God with Us (song)

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Crisco 1492 in topic GA Review
Good articleGod with Us (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 12, 2011Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:God with Us (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs) 11:32, 11 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Checklist

edit
Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
  1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. Fine
  1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Fine
2. Verifiable with no original research:
  2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. Good
  2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). Good
  2c. it contains no original research. Good
3. Broad in its coverage:
  3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. See below
  3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Fine
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Good
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Within definition
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
  6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. See below
  6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. Fine
  7. Overall assessment. Pending

Comments

edit
  • Initial comment: Awfully short. Are you sure you aren't missing anything?
1A
  • I'd suggest paraphrasing some of these quotes, as the article is so short.
    • Done
  • You should change the initial capitals in quote sentences where necessary.
    • Noted
Chart performance
  • "God With Us" debuted at No. 17 on the Billboard Hot Christian Songs chart for the chart week of October 27, 2007." -- Don't think we should repeat chart twice.
    • I think I corrected it?
3A
  • Has the song ever been covered? Performed live by MercyMe? On TV? If so, when? What were they wearing?
    • Not by a notable artist, no. I have noted uses in compilation albums instead, as well as added a section for their live performances.
  • Who produced the music video? Where was the "live setting"?
  • What songs beat it out?
    • Done
6A
  • Although more in-depth information would be preferred, I have been unable to find any coverage of this song on-line. As such, I am passing this nomination.
As there is a possibility that this may or may not go to GAR eventually, I will leave a note regarding my rationale. I do not wish to sound discriminatory, but it seems to me the lack of coverage is caused by the limited market share of Christian rock; a mainstream song like "Umbrella" would not pass at 4500 characters. I am convinced that the nominator has tried his or her best to make the article comprehensive with the limited sources available; my experience with Caffo suggests that it is acceptable, and indeed some featured articles (such as the controversial MissingNo. are not much longer than this. Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:01, 12 December 2011 (UTC)Reply