Talk:Golf (1995 video game)

Latest comment: 5 years ago by The Rambling Man in topic GA Review
Good articleGolf (1995 video game) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 24, 2008Articles for deletionKept
September 28, 2013Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
September 12, 2019Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Mario game?

edit

Why is it listed on several Mario Games lists? I cannot find any information showing it features Mario in any way. Salvidrim (talk) 16:10, 6 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps it was a misunderstanding? Isn't there a Gameboy game simply titled "Golf" that actually did have Mario in it? Sergecross73 msg me 17:42, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Yes, yes, and that's a clear fact from the boxart itself. This one was probably included mistakenly after someone confused the two. Salvidrim! 17:45, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Czar review discussion

edit
  • ✓I didn't verify sources or check for reliability
  • ✓Could use more summary of development and release in lead
  • How is Stroke best or recommended for beginners? If designed that way, say so
    • And by whom? Perhaps "The game suggests Stroke mode for new players."
  • Consider better distributing the citations, even if they're duplicated, in case someone adds more information in-between citations later
    • My major concern is that cites are lumped at the end instead of showing what information specifically came from what source (especially considering the degree to which the information is offline)
  • I would remove all of the details about the swing meter as I don't find it particularly useful. I originally removed it, but I think it should be up to you. I see how it could be a core gameplay mechanic, but I also think it's at an unnecessary level of detail—at most, a few sentences would suffice. An alternative: "The latter two are timed meters with a degree of chance." "With the latter two, players stop an indicator on a timed meter."
  • Avoid those semicolons if you can
  • I recommend using simple verbs like "put" and "let" instead of "allow", etc., especially for gameplay sections
  • ✓ clarify "use a 3D processor" for laymen?
  • I didn't ce the rest of the piece due to time, but let me know if there's something you'd like me to look at
collapsed
  • ✓ "players can choose both power and at which point to hit the ball": clarify latter point
  • ✓ Do players choose power, or is it one of those meters where you have to get lucky?
  • ✓ clarify tag added
  • ✓ "the high and low points": the arc of the ball, or the good/bad parts? Specify
  • ✓ "players compete with opponents": who? Computer opponents? Friends taking turns?
  • Removed dev section parts that were mostly irrelevant to the article and not focused on Golf's dev
  • "to achieve the game's design": ? removed
  • "The designers used a 3D": VB or Golf designers? I assumed the former.
  • Explain POLYSIS if it's worth including
  • "the developer's experience with golf games": do they have experience or not? Explain. Was the reception mixed because they didn't uphold the standard or positive because they're associated with good things? Explain the prestige thing as it pertains to the reviews too
  • "its staff gave it a 4.0, 3.2, 3.8, and 3.8": means nothing to readers, removed—can you summarize as 4/5 or 4/10 whatever it is, or explain that they praised it?
  • Lead doesn't currently reflect the article and vice versa

Discussion below (only comment in-line where absolutely necessary). Checking (✓) at the beginning of the items you've covered is okay too. I'm not watching the page, so ping me if you'd like follow-up or further copyedits.   czar  18:35, 28 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Golf (1995 video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

  • Attempted to fix sourcing for //www.elecplay.com/review_448.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:44, 29 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Golf (1995 video game)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 14:52, 11 September 2019 (UTC)Reply


Comments

  • I'm not really loving the immediacy of the footnote for the alt-name of the game (particularly as it smashes into the italic text), would it be too harmful to put it at the end of the sentence?
    • I'm not really married to it either, though in my experience I tend to see it immediately after the name.
  • "within months of the Virtual Boy console's launch" this would be more meaningful to most of us if we knew when that actually was?
    • Nixed.
  • "It was developed and published..." the last "it" was the console.
    • Addressed.
  • " T&E Soft " is piped to a redirect back to itself.
    • Addressed.
  • "Gameplay screenshot." fragment, no need for the period.
    • Fixed caption.
  • "their last shots.[2][1]" numerical order.
    • Fixed.
  • "and published by T&E Soft in Japan and Nintendo in North America " say when.
    • Fixed.
  • " within months of the " can we be more specific?
    • Nixed.
  • "positive reception; the positive reception" repetitive.
    • Fixed.
  • "Allgame" -> "AllGame". And be consistent with whether you italicise it or not.
    • Fixed.
  • "year).[13][14][11][15] " numerical order.
    • Fixed.
  • What is ref 7?
    • Removed ref; it was originally just citing the game.
  • Don't overlink All(g/G)ame.
    • Fixed.

Short and sweet article, nothing major omitted, just the few concerns above so I'm putting it on hold. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 10:48, 12 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Abryn, no problem, I'll try to take another look tonight with a view to promoting it. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 16:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
Okay, I made a few tweaks as you'd perhaps missed or misunderstood a couple of my comments. I'm content that it's just about there now. It's short and could always use expanding, but right now it's sufficient for me to promote. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 18:54, 12 September 2019 (UTC)Reply