Talk:Good News from the Next World

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Fair use rationale for Image:Simple minds-goodnews.jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Image:Simple minds-goodnews.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Q

This album also got 4 stars by Q, one of the few positive UK reviews. A reference is http://www.simpleminds.org.uk/goodnewsreviews.html Laydsb (talk) 21:51, 20 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

They were the antipode of hip at the time, and Real Life having been so aimless and bland probably blinded many reviewers to the qualities of their next album. It's their best and most cohesive '90s album and also (interestingly) no other album in their entire catalogue brings out the Catholic/Christian side of their background and inspiration more clearly than this one: it comes through convincingly and engagingly in many places. Of course that wasn't something that was gonna endear it to critics either! ;) 83.254.154.164 (talk) 11:38, 16 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Good News from the Next World. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:19, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic