Talk:Govardhan Hill
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Govardhana sila is an off shoot of the Govardhana hill worship.--Nvvchar (talk) 17:07, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Govardhan hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130123024056/http://srimadbhagavatam.com/1/3/28/en1 to http://srimadbhagavatam.com/1/3/28/en1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:58, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Proposed merge with Govardhana sila
editSame topic covered already in those article with better structure and references. Nizil (talk) 10:03, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
One is about a geographic location another mythological. Might create issue later. Ekabhishektalk 07:38, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
If a Archeological place exists then it's certainly not an mythological place change my mind 950CMR (talk) 14:00, 12 March 2021 (UTC)