Talk:GracePointe Church

"Statement of faith"

I made this revert because the text was never called a "statement of faith"; it just seems to be a welcome message. Also, the bit about the definition of megachurch was deleted for no apparent reason. StAnselm (talk) 21:07, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on GracePointe Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150215081920/http://gracepointe.net/about/our-story/ to http://gracepointe.net/about/our-story/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:31, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 05:54, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that after GracePointe Church, Nashville, Tennessee, extended full membership to LGBTQ people in 2015, average attendance fell by a third and they lost half of their average weekly donations? Source: "A month and a half later, Mitchell routinely receives emails inviting him to kill himself, often including the assurance they were sent in love from other Christians. Half of his 12-member board has left, along with half the average offering and about a third of the weekly attendance — once at 800 to 1,000 people." Hall, Heidi (3 March 2015). "As one evangelical church 'comes out' for LGBT rights, others cast a wary eye". Religion News Service. Retrieved 8 February 2023.
  • ALT1: ... that in 2015, GracePointe Church, Nashville, Tennessee, became one of the first evangelical megachurches to openly support full equality for LGBTQ people? Source: "With those words, GracePointe became one of the first evangelical megachurches in the country to openly stand for full equality and inclusion of the LGBTQ community, along with EastLake Community Church near Seattle." Dias, Elizabeth (January 29, 2015). "Nashville Evangelical Church Comes Out for Marriage Equality". Time. Retrieved February 15, 2015.
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx's Capital

5x expanded by WJ94 (talk). Self-nominated at 16:23, 14 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/GracePointe Church; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• I'll review this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:21, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Just about ready – needs a QPQ. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:30, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Excellent, thank you - I'll get my QPQ done early next week. WJ94 (talk) 15:20, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your patience BeanieFan11; I have now reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx's Capital for my QPQ. WJ94 (talk) 12:09, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:17, 20 February 2023 (UTC)