Talk:Grace (2014 film)
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Incorrect revisions
editGreetings:
Although I am not a wikipedian per say, I am concerned with some of the information that has been changed on this site : Grace (2014).
First, The change from Grace.(period) to simply Grace(2014) due to keeping punctuation out of titles is understandable - if it isn't part of the title. The movie Grace.(period) is the actual copyrighted name of the film and we feel should be represented as such, both for clarity and truth.
Also, because of the popularity that Google now puts into Wikipedia information, b removing the .(period) from our title aligns us with another film that is nothing like our film. perhaps this is of no concern to you but when people look for our movie Grace(2014) and it comes up with the Grac(2009), there is aversion for those seeking our title.
So, it is with this in mind that we ask you to return Grace(2014) to it's original Grace.(period), because it's the correct way it should be represented and it is the copyrighted name of the film.
I appreciate your entire scope of work and would sincerely appreciate it that, as a continued contributor, you would seek the correct presentation of this movie title.
I await your response.
Respectfully,
Writer 4 C Joy (talk) 21:09, 12 July 2016 (UTC)Writer 4 C Joy
- The title used throughout the article should match the title of the article. I added in the "stylized as" with the period in the lead, which is the appropriate way that it should be listed and this is used in articles all across Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not and should not be concerned with web search engines that might confuses two articles. Both of the movies have the year in the title to differentiate between them on Wikipedia. You have still not explained why you keep removing the director from the opening sentence and adding in the producer. Having the director and not having the producer in the lead is common across most film articles on Wikipedia and you would have to explain why this should be different. Since this article for over a year without a reliable source to show how it is notable, thus failing both WP:GNG and WP:NFILM, I am going to add a proposed deletion for the article. Aspects (talk) 00:52, 18 July 2016 (UTC)