This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... While it is true that the article was previously deleted via a deletion discussion, the current version of the article is substantially different from the previous version and does not warrant speedy deletion under CSD G4.
Furthermore, the Wikipedia community's policies on deletion state that articles should only be deleted if they fail to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines or violate the website's policies on content, such as copyright infringement or vandalism. The current version of the article meets the notability guidelines and contains no copyright violations or vandalism.
Moreover, as per Wikipedia's policies on deletion discussions, the outcome of a previous deletion discussion is not binding and may be revisited if new evidence or arguments are presented. The current version of the article contains new information and arguments that were not present in the previous version.
In light of these facts, I respectfully request that the article in question not be deleted under CSD G4. I have provided evidence that the article meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines, contains no violations of the website's policies, and is substantially different from the previous version. I urge you to consider this evidence and allow the article to remain on Wikipedia.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
