Talk:Great Migrations of the Serbs
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Great Migrations of the Serbs article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Very problematic author's motives !
edit@Saintstephen000, provide explanation for why would an article on Migrations of Serbs, have the whole summary dealing with the topic of Kosovo always being an Albanian land ? Next to this missing the logical structure completely, it is also very unbiased and scientifically unethical. Why do you keep reverting "Modern Analysis" section? Provide justification for the motives. I will push this to the end and revert as many times as needed, but before that I am patiently waiting for your explanation to understand this. Political agitations of this type are highly prohibited and unethical ! Bbbgsr (talk) 23:52, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Bogdani as a source
editShould Pietro Bogdani be added as a source, regarding the ethnic composition of Kosovo in 1685, especially because he was heavily involved with the Austrian war efforts in conquering Kosovo? ShockedSkater (talk) 19:00, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- No because it is a source from 1685. also this is a page about Serb migration not about different theories about ethnic composition of Kosovo. WP:Coatrack and WP:AGEMATTERS Theonewithreason (talk) 19:03, 02 October 2023 (UTC)
- So, you think that the statements from Arsenije, von Kollonitsch and Stefan of Ravanica do not belong here, because of the time they were written? ShockedSkater (talk) 19:37, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
WP COATRACK
editThis article is about Serb migrations and should include information about that, not about Albanian toponyms in Kosovo, Albanian population in Prizren etc. There are other articles dealing with thatTheonewithreason (talk) 08:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Recent Edits
editThe current version of the article was established through consensus. Any major rewording or content removal, particularly if it is going to be controversial, should be discussed on the TP first. Botushali (talk) 00:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Alright, now, please point out where and when that consensus was reached (I'm not sure what was your point to begin with). Additionaly, anyone is free to work on the article, the content is not locked and there can't be any gatekeepers, that goes against everything Wikipedia stands for. You have written a general personal view, is there something specific you are not okay with? — Sadko (words are wind) 12:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)