This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
There are many problems with this article.
0. First I am basing this on Google Maps, which obviously has problems in this area, as several places are incorrectly labeled (Ramnagar is located in what is pictured to be a lake - unless flooding is the cause - it must be wrong)
1. The coordinates given are close to a hill/ridge which Google Maps Identifies as Griddhraj Parvat but is 17 km ENE of where Google locates Ramnagar, Madhya Pradesh and 53 km ESE of Satna. It is close to where Google locates BiHarganj (2 km North of Biharganj).
2. The location →described← in the article appears on Google Maps (apparently) as a lone hill with an attached photo labeling it "gidhaila hill, ramnagar" and is 4.5 km N of where supposedly Ramnagar is and 49 km from Satna. This hill's coordinates are roughly 24°14'50"N and 81°09'18 E.
Both of these locations are consistent with part of the article and inconsistent with other parts.
I have no opinion on which is correct, or both, or neither, but the placement requires further work and confirmation. Please add the Pradesh when identifying town/village names. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abitslow (talk • contribs) 20:29, 22 May 2014 (UTC)Reply