Talk:Guagua
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Guagua article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Hokkien name
editAdded in the pre-colonial name for Guagua, as the importance of pre-colonial awareness in these kinds of thread is essential. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.134.72.125 (talk) 07:07, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- @70.134.72.125 I know it's been more than a decade already, but I would love to hear the source where you got that Hokkien name from for Guagua, cuz it could not be found in any source listing Ph. Hokkien placenames nor Mandarin placenames nor even the chinese names of Filchi schools. The Hokkien pronunciation of 偎岸 (oe-hōaⁿ /ue˧ huã˥˩/) isn't phonologically sound too to the historical name of Wawa /ˈwäː.wəʔ/. Mlgc1998 (talk) 16:14, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Guagua, Pampanga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121115103249/http://www.census.gov.ph/sites/default/files/attachments/hsd/pressrelease/Central%20Luzon.pdf to http://www.census.gov.ph/sites/default/files/attachments/hsd/pressrelease/Central%20Luzon.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120413163013/http://www.nscb.gov.ph/activestats/psgc/default.asp to http://www.nscb.gov.ph/activestats/psgc/default.asp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131004104825/http://census.gov.ph/ to http://www.census.gov.ph/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:06, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Guagua, Pampanga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120306091839/http://www.phil-ip-pines.com/catholic-churches.html to http://www.phil-ip-pines.com/catholic-churches.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:45, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 8 September 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:32, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
– Now updated WP:MOSPHIL - no need for provincial disambiguator since these are uniquely-named municipalities or towns (WP:CONCISE and WP:PRECISE). Also in accordance with the following page moves before like:
Guagua, with 1,645 readers as of 1:30 AM of 09/09/2020 (Manila time), holds the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC (if based on readership) as opposed to:
- Guagua longganisa - 73 readers
- Catá (listed on disambiguation page) - 99 readers
- Jorge Guagua (listed on disambiguation page) - 164 readers
- Piaroa language (listed on disambiguation page) - 127 readers = for a total of 390 readers.
Dollar van (833 readers) is not included here because no "guagua" has been found on its text despite it being listed in the disambiguation page. If it were included, the viewership of pages other than Guagua of Pampanga will be 1,223, still not beating the article of the Philippine town. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:38, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support. I agree that the municipality is the primary topic by usage. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:58, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.