Talk:GuduguntlaPalem
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Requested move 15 June 2016
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Already moved on 19 June, the one-word spelling has a redirect, nothing left to do. — JFG talk 06:22, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Guduguntlapalem → ? – A user moved this to Wikipedia:Guduguntla palem. I reverted this by moving the page back to its original location as the page shouldn't be in the project namespace. It seems that two different spellings are used in the article: Guduguntlapalem (one word) and Guduguntla Palem (two words, the second begins with a capital letter). There is also the third variant "Guduguntla palem" (two words, the second begins with a small letter) from the project namespace title. I can't figure out if the current page title is correct or if the article should be moved to one of the other two titles, so I'm listing it here in case someone else knows. Stefan2 (talk) 18:27, 15 June 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:49, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- I have a feeling that there isn't a correct answer to this... it boils down to transliteration perhaps. The current external link at the bottom looks promising, and I think the current title as a result of the move 3 days ago is appropriate. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 17:40, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
- I made the move as part of NPP and the spelling I found when I referenced the article. I left the single word title because removing it broke links. I did not even notice the RM discussion when I did this so I have no objection if it is undone. JbhTalk 19:58, 22 June 2016 (UTC)