This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
A fact from Gurdev Singh Gill (physician) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 February 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Gurdev Singh Gill was the first Canadian physician of Indian descent?
Latest comment: 9 months ago11 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
ALT0.A: ... that Gurdev Singh Gill was the first Canadian physician of Indian descent? Source: CBC
Article is new enough, long enough, prose is good (a sentence in the bio is a tad long and awkward), no copyright violations on text. One thing: I'm not sure of the copyright on the photo. I'm not an expert on Canadian copyright law so bear with me. On Commons it's tagged with uncertain author information, and I'm not seeing any obvious proof that the photo itself was released under the Open Government License. I'm not sure if the OGL includes or excludes photos of people. Furthermore, on Wikimedia Commons it says Note that any work originating in Canada must be in the public domain, or available under a free license, in both Canada and the United States before it can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons.. I'm not sure his photo would be available in the United States for that matter.
@Toobigtokale: many thanks for the review. I have nominated the image for deletion at commons. In the meantime, please advise me of the sentence that is long and awkward, I will work on revising the same. Cheers. Ktin (talk) 04:02, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi, I just submitted prose changes to the article, please review. Also, we don't necessarily need to wait on the image's deletion until this nomination gets approved. If you remove the image from the infobox, I'm willing to start moving to approval. I liked reading his story btw, he came to the Americas in a pioneering time for Indian immigrants. toobigtokale (talk) 04:19, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks @Toobigtokale:. The edit looks great. I have removed the image as we wait for the image to be deleted. Quick qn for you - I have asked this question and have got many different answers. What is an appropriate time after the article subject's death to upload a WP:FAIRUSE image in case a copyright appropriate image does not surface / is not found? In the past, I have heard 6 months, 2 months, and anytime after death. Appreciate your input if possible. Ktin (talk) 04:29, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hm I wasn't aware there was any such time restriction on fair use. I'm not seeing one mentioned on the page. Can you point me to anything or have you heard any reasoning behind a time delay? Does it have to do with "No free equivalent" in WP:NFCCP? toobigtokale (talk) 04:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Been a few years now and I am unable to find the conversation, but, the idea was that the time would be needed for any free images to come available during that time. Ktin (talk) 05:10, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hmm... I don't have enough experience in this matter to make a judgement call. Most people I upload pics for are long dead. I'm willing to approve either no picture or non-free picture, although someone may weigh in later on. It's up to you; let me know what you decide and I'll approve. toobigtokale (talk) 11:10, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for sharing that, interesting read. I can see the rationale for it but I agree with one of the commenters: I'd want to see that in policy before thinking it's enforceable. Regardless, I'll follow your wishes.