Talk:Guru Dutt: An Unfinished Story

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Guru Dutt: An Unfinished Story/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 02:10, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 02:10, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• Non-free use rationale looks good.
• Add a serial comma after "close friends".

Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 23:43, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Synopsis

• "became Indian official submission" → "became the Indian official submission" or "became the official submission from India"

Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 23:44, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

• Is the hyphen between "commercially-successful" necessary in this section?

Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 23:44, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Development and writing

• "It was 2004 when Yasser Usman" → "In 2004, Yasser Usman"

Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 23:48, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

• "was talking of how disturbed Dutt during" → "were talking about how disturbed Dutt was during"

Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 23:48, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

• "He quote these as his motivation" → "He quoted this as his motivation"

Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 23:48, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

• "are in the public domain" → "were in the public domain"

Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 23:48, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

• Add a serial comma after "close friends".

Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 23:48, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

• "but few died before he meet them" → "but a few died before he met them"

Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 23:48, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

• "Usman did several conversation" → "Usman had several conversations"

Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 23:48, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

• "She also discussed about her sibling relationship to Dutt" → "She also discussed her sibling relationship with Dutt"

Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 23:48, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Critical reception

• No issues here.

Publication history

• Since there were only two releases, I would remove the table and change it into simply text.

Do you want me to added a "Release" section? I think it will be too short, so the table format is the most ideal one. Oh, if you mean keep the "Publication history" section but changed the table to sentences, the problem is same too. --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 23:51, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

References

• Sources are archived.

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·