Talk:Gwiin Jo (Injo)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Paine Ellsworth in topic Requested move 22 March 2022

Titles

edit

All the titles already appear in the biography (the source should be added there), so I don't think it's a problem if there's also a separate section to make it easier to find them. Maria0215 (talk) 16:57, 21 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

There are no sources of any sort anywhere in the article. DrKay (talk) 17:45, 21 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
I've shocked for your action. She have full biography in the Veritable Records of the Joseon Dynasty, an important historical book of Korea. Offline source is accept on Wikipedia. No need other Ref if Annual of Joseon is referenced. But i added other citations. VocalIndia (talk) 17:47, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
I really don't understand. She is very very very influenced royal consort of Joseon and significant than other consorts. No referenced = why your choice was delete ? This is not a good behavior. VocalIndia (talk) 17:53, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Unsourced material can be removed at any time. This is standard policy and is not negotiable. DrKay (talk) 20:07, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 22 March 2022

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved to Gwiin Jo (Injo). See consensus below to rename this article; however, see no agreement for any particular new title. WP:OTHEROPTIONS leads us to choose among the following names:

For now at least, the best choice appears to be Gwiin Jo (Injo). OTHEROPTIONS tells us, "the closer should pick the best title of the options available, and then be clear that while consensus has rejected the former title (and no request to bring it back should be made lightly), there is no consensus for the title actually chosen. And if anyone objects to the closer's choice, then instead of taking it to move review, they should simply make another move request at any time, which will hopefully lead the article to its final stable title." Thanks and kudos to editors for your input; good health to all! P.I. Ellsworth - ed. put'r there 05:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Reply


Royal Consort Gwiin Jo → ? – Gwi-in means Consort so the current title is equivalent to Royal Consort Royal Consort Jo. It's also not found in any reliable sources. The article title should adhere to Wikipedia:Article titles, not be an unrecognizable and invented mish-mash. DrKay (talk) 20:11, 22 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 20:56, 29 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Note: WikiProject Biography has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 20:56, 29 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Note: WikiProject Korea has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 20:56, 29 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ Ro, Myounggu; Park, Suhee, eds. (2016). The King at the Palace: Joseon Royal Court Culture at the National Palace Museum of Korea. National Palace Museum of Korea. p. 312. ISBN 9788997748297. 2nd class Concubine from the Jo clan (deposed gwiin)
  2. ^ Adams, Edward Ben (1974). Through Gates of Seoul: Trails and Tales of Yi Dynasty. Vol. 1. Taewon Publishing Corporation. p. 356. OCLC 929760427. Injo had ... two sons and one daughter by concubine Cho
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.