Talk:Héctor Garza

Latest comment: 4 years ago by MWright96 in topic GA Review
Good articleHéctor Garza has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starHéctor Garza is part of the LLA Azteca Champions and challengers series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 11, 2019Good article nomineeListed
June 25, 2020Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Héctor Garza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:49, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Héctor Garza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:08, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Héctor Garza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:38, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Héctor Garza/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 13:33, 23 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Will review. MWright96 (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Lead

edit
  • "was a Mexican professional wrestler," Delink Mexican to avoid WP:SEAOFBLUE
  • "better known by his ring name" - better: the
  • "Garza also worked for several major US-based promotions" - the text highlighted in bold is reudndant
  • Don't link United States per WP:OVERLINK
  • "and the Mexican National Tag Team Championship as well as being inducted in the AAA Hall of Fame posthumously." - here's an improvement to avoid a continous run-on sentence: He was posthumously inducted into the AAA Hall of Fame.

Professional wrestling career

edit
  • "After being trained by his uncle Mario Segura, as well as Mr. Lince and Blue Fish," - and Mr. Lince and Blue Fish,
  • "his first prominent storyline feud played out in 1993 as he was paired up with El Sanguinario " - just wording it as plain paired is all that is needed

Consejo Mundial de Lucha Libre (1994–1996)

edit
  • "hired him to work on a national scale instead" - more concise: nationally
  • "as part of CMLL's rebuilding after the split" - change to the text in bold to just a because it would confuse non-wrestling readers who know nothing about the split

AAA / World Wrestling Federation (1996–1997)

edit
  • "When Garza joined AAA he" - add a comma between "joined" and "he"
  • "he was also able to work for the US based" - US-based
  • "A the 1997 Royal Rumble pay-per-view" - A spelling error is present in this text and make it explicit it was a pay-per-view event
  • "Garza teamed up with lucha libre legends" - please try to avoid wording such as "legends"
  • "In AAA he often worked as part of a trio known as La Maquina del Amor ("The Love Machine") alongside Heavy Metal and Latin Lover as a trio" - reptition of the phrase "a trio" which should be avoided
  • "All three members of La Maquina del Amor ended up qualifying" - qualified
  • "which Lain Lover ended up winning." - won.

World Championship Wrestling (1997–1999)

edit
  • "which lead to many AAA workers" - typo; should be written as led
  • "as he challenged Steven Regal for the WCW World Television Championship" - when is an more appropriate word to use in this case
  • "In the fall of 1997 Garza scored a surprising victory over Scott Hall" - surprising according to whom?

AAA (1999–2004)

edit
  • "In the end Latin Lover defeated Garza" - You don't need the text highlighted in bold because it is redundant
  • "On May 5, 2003, lost the Mexican National Heavyweight Championship to E; Zorro," - Shouldn't that say Garza lost that particular championship?

Total Non-Stop Action Wrestling (2004)

edit
  • Delink the United States per WP:OVERLINK
  • "with Garza getting particularly good reactions from the crowd." - the text in bold is not particularly formal for a style on Wikipedia and should be reworded accordingly
  • "In June, he jumped back to CMLL, claiming that AAA owner Antonio Peña owed him money for Garza's dates in TNA." - this sentences will needed a reliable source to support its claim
  • Also, "jumped back to CMLL" would be better written formally as returned to CMLL
  • In June, he returned to CMLL, claiming that AAA owner Antonio Peña owed him money for his TNA work." - this entire sentence is not attracted to a reliable citation and will require on. MWright96 (talk) 10:19, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • "he helped Perro Aguayo Jr. turn heel" - what does turn heel mean? I'd prefer it to be re-worded to make it more understandable to non-wrestling readers
  • The link to Canek is directed to the Maya Kings rank and not the wrestler El Canek
  • "the AAA-TNA deal was dead so TNA decided to bring Garza back." - an improvement to avoid informal wording: was termiated and TNA elected to bring Garza back.
  • "The push continued with a match against NWA World Heavyweight Champion Jeff Jarrett on TNA's weekly TV show." - this sentence is not referenced and will need a reliable source to verify it.

Consejo Mundial de Lucha Libre (2005–2011)

edit
  • "After being deported," - was he actually deported or not? If so what was the reason given?
  • "In August, Pierroth Jr. was kicked out of the group" - ejected from
  • "double hair vs. hair matchas the main event of the CMLL 72nd Anniversary Show." - as the main event
  • "in the finals of a tournament" - which tournament was this?
  • "In March 2010 signs of dissention amongst the team began showing as Garza walked out on the team" - left them
  • "Following the walk out Garza kept insincerely" - Following this,

Los Invasores (2010)

edit
  • "Garza's third reign and Mr. Águila's first reign with the title." - eliminate the second mention of the word "reign"

Perros del Mal Producciones (2011–2012)

edit
  • Don't italize Triplemania XX

Personal life

edit
  • "Segura's son, Solano's cousin is known as "El Ninja Jr." - It is better to just mention that he is Solano's cousin?
  • "while his nephew, Humberto Garza Solano, works under the ring name Garza Jr.." - and his nephew, Humberto Garza Solano, works under the ring name Garza Jr.
  • "In 2005, Solano was set to wrestle Scott Hall at TNA's TNA Final Resolution 2005" - remove one of the two mentions of TNA to avoid the extreme close repetition of the same acronym
  • "Garza would later sell T-shirts that read "If Pepe el Toro is innocent, so is Héctor Garza", alluding to the story of an old movie where a carpenter is incriminated on a murder and goes to jail where he finds the true assassins and fights with them and pops out the eye of the mastermind to make him confess "Pepe el Toro es inocente"." - This entire portion of text is unreferenced and requires a reliable source that verifies the information
  • "alluding to the story of an old movie where a carpenter is incriminated on a murder and goes to jail" - 1950s film and is imprisoned respectively

Championships and accomplishments

edit
  • "PWI ranked him #19 of the 500 best singles wrestlers of the PWI 500 in 2004" - This statement is unreferenced and will require a reliable citation
  • "International X Division Cup (2004)" - same issue as above

Footnotes

edit
  • The first, third and fourth notes lack a period to end the respective sentences
  • You don't need to have an additional footnote to state where further information could be located as seen in other GAs. MWright96 (talk) 10:19, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

References

edit
  • What is the ISBN for the first reference? It would be benefical to have that information included
  • Reference 11 requires the date it was accessed
  • Reference 19 is lacking the website that published the page
  • References 15, 20, 22, 23, 29, 78 are missing the pages that cite the information it is attached to
  • You've introduced a reference error with the ref name "PWI5002004" that will need to be addressed. MWright96 (talk) 10:19, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • Reference 60 is lacking the author who wrote the article, the date it was published and the date it was accessed
  • Reference 68 is missing the translation of the Spanish title to English
  • Reference 71 does not have the date it was published and the date at which it was accessed for reference on Wikipedia
  • Reference 85 is dead and needs to be archived

Overall there are some issues concering the grammar to the prose and to the verifiability of some of the content which does not have a reliable source attaced to it. Another big issue is the lack of parts for some of the references of which one of the online citations I found was dead. As most of the issues seem like quick fixes, I will put the review on hold until all of the fixes have been adressed accordingly. Feel free to comment in this review which ones you've gone through and if you have any additional comments on any of the queries above. MWright96 (talk) 19:35, 23 November 2019 (UTC)Reply