Talk:Hélène Cixous

Cixous LGBT

I see that Cixous has been added to the LGBT philosophers category. I'm aware that there is some treatment of lesbianism in Cixous's work, but on what basis is this characterisation made? Buffyg 11:50, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

Pronunciation

That 'x' is very tricky for English-speakers. I suggest a little pronunciation key in IPA. -ZA

Section on Influences - Pointless?

Much of the material in the section of Influences does not seem to present how these thinkers have impacted the work of Hélène Cixous. The section on Freud is sounds likes something on a fashcard for an intro to pysch class than something that should be in this article. --chemica 01:59, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
I respectfully disagree. You can't talk about a critique of the normative psychological or literary discourse without saying what that discourse is. Lacan and Derrida sections are fine; you're right that Freud could be better, but instead of subtracting we should simply say what Cixous does after taking this as her point of departure.Sardino (talk) 18:55, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
I agree with the original criticism - the influences section currently lists only the theories of other philosophers/psychoanalysts, gives a brief description and then moves on. It may be better if there was a list of influences and then an explanation of Cixous' contribution. Currently it would seem that if you want a shorthand definition of "penis envy", you'd come here, but not if you're actually interested in Cixous' theories.--58.175.81.225 (talk) 06:48, 9 August 2008 (UTC) Yup, I agree too. Even in the Derrida section, which at least mentions Cixous, that's all there is - a mention. There's nothing about what Cixous does with those theories. If it's really important to have those theories outlined on this page they should at least be directly connected with Cixous' response to them. It's not even necessary to have those theories outlined here since, you know, there are other wikipedia articles about them. More apt might be "Cixous responds to Freud's analysis of women's penis envy with blahblahblah in her work blahblahblah." Labellementeuse (talk) 05:54, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:08, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

logocentrism?

The article states: "Through deconstruction, Derrida employed the term logocentrism (which was not his coinage). This is the concept that explains how language relies on a hierarchical system that values the written word over the spoken word in Western culture. The idea of binary opposition is essential to Cixous' position on language."

I'm fairly sure that this account of logocentrism is reversed: speech is valued over the written word, and not vice versa! Derrida's angle in Of Grammatology was that speech was taken to be more 'present' and closer to the Truth of meaning. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.62.84.51 (talk) 04:46, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Derrida

I found this gem in a scholarly journal of Derrida and Cixous exchanging thoughts and ideas; I thought I'd add an excerpt where Derrida speaks about what he and Cixous have in common, and their rootedness in the French language.Matipop (talk) 18:09, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hélène Cixous. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160608050554/http://www.arte.tv/guide/fr/059529-000-A/vincennes-l-universite-perdue to http://www.arte.tv/guide/fr/059529-000-A/vincennes-l-universite-perdue
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040409090818/http://www.engl.niu.edu/wac/cixous_intro.html to http://www.engl.niu.edu/wac/cixous_intro.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:12, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Adding references

I'm working, slowly but surely, on adding references to this page in an effort to improve representation of women in the arts and humanities on Wikipedia. I'm new to Wikipedia so would appreciate any and all constructive criticism or assistance! I read some Cixous when I did my masters, and I know there's more information out there on her. The trouble will be finding it in English. Rachaelreally (talk) 18:08, 2 November 2018 (UTC)