Talk:HMS Colossus (1910)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Peacemaker67 in topic GA Review
 | HMS Colossus (1910) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 9, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.svg)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Colossus (1910)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 07:17, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
This article is in pretty good shape.
- In the lead, which battle?
- The displacement in the text and infobox doesn't match.
- link shp in text
- link Port and starboard
- probably worth specifying that the secondary guns were in single mounts
- After introducing BS as an abbreviation, suggest referring to 1st BS and subsequent mentions of BS
- link Home Fleet at first mention
- suggest linking mobilisation
- link dreadnought at sixteen dreadnoughts
- 1900 should be 19:00
- The sentence beginning During the battle has a repetition of "during the battle"
- suggest and was refitted to suit her new role
- suggest and she returned to Devonport where she was again listed for disposal
- images are all appropriately licensed and captioned.
That's me done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:33, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for catching these mistakes. I'll wait on your responses in the Hercules review on the dreadnought and Home Fleet links before doing anything here.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:40, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- I always think it is worth linking at first mention in the body, but it's not a requirement, so I'm ok either way. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:57, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, and is illustrated by appropriately license images with appropriate captions. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:06, 9 March 2017 (UTC)