Talk:HMS Gallant (H59)/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Thurgate in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Thurgate (talk) 00:43, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- prose: (MoS):
- prose: (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
-
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
edit1. complement was 137 officers and men in peacetime. Might be worth noting the additional men in wartime.
- Done.
2. Exclusive of government-furnished equipment like the armament. Do you mean Excluding?
- Done.
3. her sister Griffin. Suggest - her sister-ship Griffin
- Nope, already referred to her as sister ship earlier. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:18, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 00:43, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Nice Work, Passed. Thurgate (talk) 14:40, 22 February 2011 (UTC)