Talk:HMS Greyhound (H05)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Thurgate (talk) 17:18, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   prose: (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

1. Exclusive of government-furnished equipment. Suggest - Excluding government-furnished equipment

• As always.

2. Aside from a brief period assigned to the 20th Destroyer Flotilla. Suggest - Aside from a brief period were she was assigned to the 20th Destroyer Flotilla

• Good idea.

3. withdrawal of the three survivors later that day. Are those the British destroyers that survived?

• Reworded.

4. 28/29 March. Suggest - 28-29 March

• Nope, this is the proper usage according to the MOS for the night of.

5. Stukas. Suggest - A link, or German Junkers Ju 87 dive bombers

• Did the same thing as for the other article.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:37, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 17:18, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Nice work Strum. Passed. Thurgate (talk) 00:29, 2 March 2011 (UTC)