 | HMS Moresby has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 4, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.svg)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Moresby/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 11:29, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Comments
- "previous L-class destroyer, capable" destroyer overlinked.
- Done.
- "First War Construction Programme" this sounds notable, should we redlink it for an article?
- None of the programmes have articles yet. This could be a nice task for someone.
- "The destroyer was..." last destroyer you mentioned was the rumoured German one.
- Thank you. I have clarified this.
- "displacement was" capital D.
- Good spot.
- Link long tons, unusual unit.
- Done.
- "shaft horsepower" link.
- Done.
- "296 long tons" avoid starting sentence with numeral.
- Reworded.
- "torpedoes.[5]The ship" space.
- Done.
- Could link complement to Ship's company.
- Wikilinked.
- "changed to Moresby.[8] The new name honoured" -> "changed to Moresby to honour"
- Done.
- "the Grand Fleet, joining" overlinked.
Done.
- "in what would be the" in the.
Done.
- "protect the battlecruisers of the Fleet" -> "of the Grand Fleet"
- Done.
- "the reconnaissance seaplane had been recovered" I missed this happening...
- Sentence added.
- "rejoined the Flotilla and" flotilla unless you use the full formal title.
- Fixed.
- "German High Seas Fleet. The two" overlinked.
- Removed.
- "after 1710 on " make it clear it's the time, i.e. 17:10 or 1710 hours or whatever MOS:TIME suggests.
- Done.
- "and at 2:15 turned" same. Is that 02:15, 2:15pm??
- Done
- "to Buncrana with" where??
- Clarified.
- Could convoy escort be linked to Escort Group?
- I do not think it was not so formal then.
- Changed.
- Pennant number table, no reason to capitalise Number, and row/col scopes would be much appreciated for accessibility.
- Fixed.
- Ref 11, 12, should just be p.
- Fixed.
That's all I have. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 19:43, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: Thank you. I have amended the article. Please tell me if there is anything else. simongraham (talk) 23:01, 3 September 2021 (UTC)