Talk:HMS Triumph (1903)

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Jackyd101 in topic GA Review
Good articleHMS Triumph (1903) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starHMS Triumph (1903) is part of the Swiftsure class battleship series, a good topic. It is also part of the Predreadnought battleships of the Royal Navy series, a good topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 7, 2012Good article nomineeListed
June 25, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
August 23, 2020Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Triumph (1903)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jackyd101 (talk · contribs) 00:09, 7 April 2012 (UTC) Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the Wikipedia:good article criteria, with suggestions for future development. These are not required to achieve GA standard, but they might help in future A-class or FAC review process.Reply

  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  • Is a link to South American dreadnought race relevant for the design paragraph (this point is also relevant to the HMS Swiftsure (1903) article I reviewed a few days ago).
  • Captain during the First World War was Maurice Swynfen Fitzmaurice - this should be mentioned in the article.
  • It would be beneficial to incorporate some information on the wreck of Triumph. This website [1] might not qualify as an RS, but it does demonstrate that there is interest in the wreck as a dive site and that there has been a National Geographic documentary made on the shipwreck.
  • It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation):   b (all significant views):  
  • It is stable.
     
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned):   b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):   c (non-free images have fair use rationales):  
  • Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:  

Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.--Jackyd101 (talk) 00:09, 7 April 2012 (UTC)Reply