Talk:HMS Triumph (1903)/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Jackyd101 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jackyd101 (talk · contribs) 00:09, 7 April 2012 (UTC) Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the Wikipedia:good article criteria, with suggestions for future development. These are not required to achieve GA standard, but they might help in future A-class or FAC review process.Reply

  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  • Is a link to South American dreadnought race relevant for the design paragraph (this point is also relevant to the HMS Swiftsure (1903) article I reviewed a few days ago).
  • Captain during the First World War was Maurice Swynfen Fitzmaurice - this should be mentioned in the article.
  • It would be beneficial to incorporate some information on the wreck of Triumph. This website [1] might not qualify as an RS, but it does demonstrate that there is interest in the wreck as a dive site and that there has been a National Geographic documentary made on the shipwreck.
  • It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation):   b (all significant views):  
  • It is stable.
     
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned):   b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):   c (non-free images have fair use rationales):  
  • Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:  

Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.--Jackyd101 (talk) 00:09, 7 April 2012 (UTC)Reply