Talk:Haematoxylum campechianum

Black dye

This article needs a connection to "The rise of formal black" in the Natural dye article. A potential connection could also be made the "Provisions" section of the Continental Association article where the use black cloth was restricted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.237.150.151 (talk) 19:17, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

"In a small demonstrative experiment, if two drops, one of concentrated ammonia and one of logwood extract, are placed close enough the NH3 vapours will change to a purple shade." Is it really the ammonia vapour which changes colour, or perhaps the drop of logwood extract which undergoes this change? Dawright12 (talk) 13:47, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Haematoxylum campechianum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090201175204/http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?18172 to http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?18172

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:51, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 11 August 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Procedural close. As noted below, this page has already been moved back to the target title. Kudos to editors for your input, and Happy Publishing! (nac by page mover) P.I. Ellsworth  ed. ^put'r there 19:21, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

---

Bluewood → Haematoxylum campechianum – More commonly known by other vernacular names, and best (precisely) identified by scientific name. The name bluewood is shared with other species, such as Condalia spp. (Not an uncontroversial move, and "Flora should use their common name for article names" runs counter to much of the info provided at WP:FLORA.) However, curious to hear others' thoughts. —Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 04:15, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

SUPPORT MOVE to Haematoxylum campechianum. "Bluewood" is not the most common name for this flora; using the scientific name reduces confusion, in concert with hatnotes for clarification where necessary on other pages. Also the previous move to Bluewood was done with a sledgehammer, overwriting everything to "bluewood" even within quotes and links, and needs to be reverted anyway. --TheLastBrunnenG (talk) 16:13, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

• Note I boldly moved the article back to Haematoxylum campechianum, as part of BRD. I agree with Hyperiks reasonings listed here, and will note that several other of the moves made by were to made up "common names" when the species didnt actually have a common name.--Kevmin § 14:51, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

---

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.