Talk:Half-crown (New Zealand coin)/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Queen of Hearts (talk · contribs) 18:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

I'll take this. ^Queenof_Hearts 18:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Shoot, I forgot about this. I'll review it later today. ^Queenof_Hearts 04:16, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Criteria

Good Article Status - Review Criteria

Further information: WP:WIAGA

A good article is—

1. Well-written:

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.

2. Verifiable with no original research:

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);

(c) it contains no original research; and

(d) it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.

3. Broad in its coverage:

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Notes

Review

1. Well-written:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (prose)	In Reception, might wanna expand British MP John Sandeman Allen raised the issue... to British member of parliament John Sandeman Allen raised the issue.... In Centennial commemorative, I had to Google what "protracted" meant. Maybe I'm dumb, but I'd change it to "drawn out" or something of the sort. In Reception, The New Zealand Baptist declared the removal to reflect the atheistic attitudes of the New Zealand government. should be The New Zealand Baptist declared the removal was to reflect the atheistic attitudes of the New Zealand government. or something of the sort.	On hold
(b) (MoS)	LGTM	Pass

2. Verifiable with no original research:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (references)	LGTM.	Pass
(b) (citations to reliable sources)	Spotchecking Stocker 2005, Stocker 2010, and Stocker 2011. Stocker 2005: LGTM Stocker 2010: LGTM (I didn't realize this was only invoked once...) Stocker 2011: footnote 23, article states In late August and September 1938, a competition was held for the design of the commemorative half-crown, as well as for the proposed penny and halfpenny denominations, however the source seems to specify Competitors were allowed to submit any number of designs in the brief timeframe available between the date of invitation, 22 August 1938, and the closing date of 30 September. Otherwise, LGTM.	On hold
(c) (original research)	LGTM	Pass
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism)	One minor spot of CLOP: In Centennial commemorative, This change was approved by the High Commissioner in August 1939, and the coin entered production. Any way to reword "approved by the High Commissioner"?	On hold

3. Broad in its coverage:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (major aspects)	LGTM	Pass
(b) (focused)	LGTM	Pass

4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

Notes	Result
LGTM	Pass

5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Notes	Result
This is fine.	Pass

6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)	LGTM	Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)	LGTM	Pass

Result

Result	Notes
On hold

Discussion

@Generalissima: Dear fucking Lord, I am sorry this took so long. Placing on hold. ^Queenof_Hearts 04:31, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

• @Queen of Hearts: Hey, no worries! Made fixes per your review.Generalissima (talk) 06:21, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.