Talk:Halo Legends

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleHalo Legends has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 13, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
April 13, 2010Featured topic candidatePromoted
May 1, 2010Good article nomineeListed
March 15, 2013Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Good article

TV Anime Box?

edit

The TV Anime box doesn't seem appropriate for this kind of entry. For starters it's not a TV series it's a direct-to-video production. I'm thinking the general movie template is more appropriate for this. --ShortShadow (talk) 01:22, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yea, I didn't really know what to put for that. I was confused because the individual stories are called episodes. The general movie template suites it much better. Orracle107 (talk) 03:35, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Akira Toriyama

edit

No mention of how Odd One Out is also a parody on Toriyama's productions (e.g., Dragon Ball franchise)? The connection is not exactly subtle. --MikeZ (talk) 14:50, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

If you find a reliable source on that topic, we can certainly add it. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 15:38, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Info Skimmed over

edit

I'm sorry to be the one to point this out, but information on the animation style as well as information of the secondary main characters has been completely left out of the desription of each of the videos. I am unable to change this myself due to the fact that i am rather new to Wikipedia, and have not yet mastered its editing engine. If anyone could get back to me on this, I would be most appreciative. --I.Am.Silver.Fox (talk) 21:41, 19 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

If you have reliable sources on the animation style and production, it's welcome. However we are not a directory or place for plot details not necessary to the understanding of the work as a whole—a list of characters would fall under that scope. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 21:53, 19 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

"Odd One Out" not canon

edit

Why is "Odd One Out" not Canon? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.163.17.213 (talk) 19:46, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Because it's a parody. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 20:12, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Did Bungie say it's not canon?comment added by 74.163.17.213 (talk) 19:46, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Why not read the reference? [1] Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 20:30, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Halo Legends. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:33, 30 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Halo Legends. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:37, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Reply