Talk:Hammond arson case
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hammond arson case article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hammond arson case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ktvz.com/news/refuge-occupiers-settle-in-concerns-mount-in-burns/37249044
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:39, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Misleading Photo on Page
editThe first (and only) photo on the page is of Ammon Bundy rather than the primary subjects of the page (i.e. the land where the arson occurred or Dwight and Steven Hammond who were convicted of the arson and later pardoned). Subsequently, when referring to this page (e.g. on Facebook), the photo of Ammon Bundy represents it (which seems wrong to me). In the absence of photos of the land and/or the Hammonds (before Ammon Bundy's photo), I would suggest that the photo of Ammon Bundy be removed from this page. (Anybody have some photos to add?) Kjpires (talk) 15:20, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Disagree. It's halfway down the article and is related to the aftermath and related Bundy case. There is no confusion here. If this was in the infobox, I'd agree. But it's not. It's a supplementary photo for an article that is lacking a main photo for the lede. Leitmotiv (talk) 16:28, 10 July 2018 (UTC)