Talk:Hans Baluschek

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Sca in topic Image layout

Untitled

edit

This article was translated from German Wikipedia. Sca (talk)

Image layout

edit

Hafspajen and Sca, please stop and talk about the layout. I note that nobody has removed the big picture of the arriving train - the disagreement there seems to be about where to position it. I've removed the indentation because it causes the image to bump half the references to the far right in a most peculiar way. Whether the image should go on the left or the right, there or higher - please discuss. The other issue is the bottom gallery. I agree, it's desirable to have the images be large enough to see. But I'm not sure you are keeping in mind that the number on a row is going to vary depending on the reader's monitor dimensions or how wide they have the window set to be. If you are using a large monitor, try moving the border of the window and you will see the images rearrange themselves into a different number of rows. You may well be seeing quite different versions of the article from each other. Please talk this through. Yngvadottir (talk) 19:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Yngvadottir, see Sca's talk. I tried to talk about edit war, with the third revert. Hafspajen (talk) 20:04, 20 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
I've now looked there, and it's pretty clear you are seeing different layouts. Each of you has seen the other's version creating one picture hanging alone under the others in the gallery. Please talk about it and figure out how to get the gallery to work acceptably for both of you. On the placement of the train - you two need to talk about it, I don't know the reasoning behind putting it on the left, but indented. I'll now bow out. Yngvadottir (talk) 21:16, 20 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
Yngvadottir, I'm not going to discuss this with Herr Hafspajen any more; he's not amenable to anything I say and insists on his way or the highway. Suddenly this week he changed his longstanding genial attitude toward me — after a whole year of fruitful collaboration. Let him do what he wants. Sca (talk) 21:33, 20 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
PS: I moved the train to right. You of course are welcome to make any changes you deem appropriate. Sca (talk) 21:55, 20 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

NO - YOU did. You changed YOUR ways. Read just User talk:Hafspajen#Hilfe bitte! Oh, than I was good to have. Only TWO DAYS AGO!! But now ... edit war! And it was MY work the layout, it was my work that blasted Winter article - and I don't usually go editwarring with people who are nice to me. ACTUALLY NEVER EVER DID: No, if somebody from outside is not getting into this - explaing that it is not OK editwarring - I AM NOT interested. I am not here to help people just for getting kicked in the as as a thank you for being nice. just read this now deleted exchange. Help me please.. and two days after behaving like this.... I had enough problems in my private life and a whole lot other things.

AND -
1) you should discuss and not revert - that is elementary.

+

2) you should try to act civilized
) it is NOT OK to revert 4 times in 24 hours.
  • I am tired of Wikipedia, I am seriously thinking of stopping editing soon. Maybe in a short while.

This is not fun, people getting crazy like this. Yngvadottir or Crisco 1492 - tell him what edit war and three revert rule is. Hafspajen (talk) 23:12, 20 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

As I said in big bold letters on my talk page, do what you want with Baluschek. I won't make any more changes. Let's just drop it. It's a dead horse. Sca (talk) 00:24, 21 December 2014 (UTC)Reply