Talk:Hare-um Scare-um

Egghead?

I've not seen this short - can Egghead either be linked to an article telling more about the character OR can a short summary, even in parenthesis, be added regarding the name?

Fair use rationale for Image:Hareumscareum.jpg

Image:Hareumscareum.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Lost ending

There is a lost ending to this cartoon and the blog entry that was posted by a animation historian. It is unacceptable for someone like this user to remove a section that featured a blog entry from a well-known historian, which featured scenes from the ending. Here's what the user did. StevenMario (talk) 02:09, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

I think you'll find that policies about questionable sources, such as blogs, expressly allow users to remove material they don't find credible. And you have to admit, with your spotty record on sourcing, many editors will, and have, found your additions lacking. Wazowski was perfectly within his rights to remove what he did. As I've tried to stress over and over the last few days, learn the rules around here. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 06:06, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

You may think so, but if blog entrees are by someone well-known (for example Lee Unkrich's Twitter blog), then it is considered reliable StevenMario (talk) 23:35, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Lost Ending

Who is responsible for removing the subject of the Lost Ending? As soon as the bunnies appear after the hunter say, "I can whip you, and your whole family!", There is a cut from the original print and this was shown to audiences in 1939.A film historian archived the ending from an original print, which the ending clearly showing the hunter being beaten up by bunnies every where. People who visit this article is supposed to know the TRUE Ending. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramadya26 (talk • contribs) 17:22, 23 August 2012 (UTC)