Talk:Harold S. Vincent High School

Latest comment: 8 years ago by KDTW Flyer in topic GA Review

Concerning Nominations for this article becoming a 'WikiProjects-Schools good article;', please discuss your development ideas here. For an example of an existing Good Article, go to Westfield High School (Fairfax County, Virginia) or for a projection article, go to United States Air Force Academy.


You may also wish to participate in the WikiProject at Vincent HS campaign by adding your username to the WikiProject Schools list. Doing so will increase public awareness concerning improvement efforts and drives that you and your associates may be working on.

Areas Needing Improvement

edit

Periodically, articles on this site will need general upkeep and maintenance. This particular article may benefit from the improvement effort by adding on information concerning the background and current evens of the main theme. Examples of this would be:

  1. School Principals Listing
  2. Employee/Staff/Maintenance on Site
  3. Atheletics Department Archives
    1. State Championships

##Regional Championships

    1. Star Players (per season)
    2. Star Players (current season)
  1. Awards & National Media

#Debate Team Archives

  1. Drama Club Activites
  2. Visits/Liasions With Public Administrators
  3. Visits/Liasions With Celebrities
  4. National Media
  5. Academic Awards
    1. Academic Excellence
    2. Academic Standards
    3. Academic Honors
    4. Academic Objectives Currently

#Testing & Curicullum

  1. Major & Planned Renovations —Preceding unsigned comment added by Habatchii (talkcontribs) 02:13, 30 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Review this information for accuracy and other needed material.



Habatchii (talk) 01:15, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

I struck several of the above today. Criteria and guidelines must have changed since 2008. John from Idegon (talk) 06:29, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Harold S. Vincent High School/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: KDTW Flyer (talk · contribs) 15:29, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

This article meets 3 out of 6 of the criteria for Good Article, it also met the requirements for automatic failure.

Immediate failures

edit

These are the following reasons that I have found to automatically fail the nomination

  1. This article has clean-up banners which are currently valid.
  2. This article is currently recognized as a Wisconsin school stub article, which cannot be given GA status.
  3. This article far from meeting one or more of the GA criteria.

Good article criteria

edit

This is how I felt that I felt the article matched up aginst all the criteria for GA.

  1. The article is pretty much free of major spelling/grammar errors, but I feel that it isn't quite clear and concise.
  2. This article does cite sources to credible sources, but it is marked as needing more to verify the content stated.
  3. I feel that this article is very dry on addressing the main aspects of the school; however, I feel that this article stays on topic and does not go into unnecessary detail.
  4. I definitely feel that this article meets this criterion as it is neutral in its wording.
  5. This article is pretty stable and significant charges are not occurring on a day to day basis.
  6. This article contains only an image of the logo and is not illustrated by any other means.

Thank You, KDTW Flyer (talk) 15:29, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply