Talk:Harry Hooton

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Bjenks in topic Discuss links here

No references

edit

This article does not cite any references in relation to content. I do not dispute that the person existed but unverified content may be removed where suitable third party references are not provided. The current reference that is present is a direct link to the website of the initial editor and breaches WP:V#SELF--VS talk 04:12, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

When VS talk deleted the link he also deleted the major notable reference source for this article. I guess that's the logic of using a guideline as a rule instead of applying it as a guideline only and assessing the relevancy of the link in the first place. --Takver 17:08, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Editors regularly clean out undiscussed links from this article. Please discuss here if you want a link not to be cleaned out regularly. (You can help!)--VS talk 04:34, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

VS talk has removed an external link to a website which I published. I believe the link is a relevant citation to this article. I acknowledge as an editor of this article, this is potentially a conflict of interest.

The link:

is an original source reference for this article. Sasha Soldatow wrote the contemporary biography on Harry Hooton. I believe this link is highly relevant to the article. Under Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guideline I should not add external links to articles I have published (even though they may be authoritative texts) except after raising them for discussion on the talk page. Please discuss and decide on the relevancy of the link.--Takver 17:08, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

not having a coi i've just added it as the reference :), is that ok? in theory someone might quibble that your website might not meet WP:RS but as it's a reprint of soldatow's published introduction, can't really see how anyone can argue with that. ben  ⇒ bsnowball  05:11, 29 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've added the National Biography site to external links. Not at this moment pausing to beef up the article with material from that source but it wouldn't hurt. Jeremytrewindixon 02:37, 22 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I wish to see the quote "Hooton's constant attitude and literary style was extravagant, provocative and explicitly outrageous" changed ( as it is merely one opinion and doesn't necessarily represent a 'general consensus' of his attitude or work). Provocative yes but "explicitly outrageous" denotes his work in a bias manner. *note: the author of this quote (Terry McMullen) was then a young student. I will be looking to replace it with a more objective quote. Perhaps from the view of an editor/publisher etc. from the time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NRCHYTCH (talkcontribs) 02:47, 30 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

I've added a link to the now-digitised text of McMullen's Hermes article. In response to the above, I must add that McMullen was not then "a young student" but a mature member of the Psychology Dept staff at Sydney University. Negative bias toward Hooton was not possible because the two were close friends. I was introduced to Harry by Terry in about October 1960, after he had been diagnosed with bowel cancer. An autopsy later disclosed a healed tuberculosis condition which had never been diagnosed nor suspected. Bjenks (talk) 04:33, 22 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Harry Hooton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:43, 30 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Harry Hooton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:06, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply