Talk:Harryhausen: The Lost Movies

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 19 May 2020 by reviewer Zanimum (talk · contribs).

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Previous AfD

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Note, this had been deleted through AfD, but it seems to meet notability now. -- Zanimum (talk) 00:17, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Querying Revert

Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I would like to dispute the revert made by Melcous on Tuesday August 13th. The non-promotional information added here is relevant to the content of the article. SquallDegu (talk) 16:41, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

SquallDegu It would be helpful if you could explain why you think this information is relevant and notable. Generally speaking, putting information about forthcoming exhibitions in and of itself can be seen as promotional - it hasn't happened yet, so it is not yet encyclopedic, rather it is essentially advertising the event. This is even more so when multiple quotes are included using non-neutral language about it. So the most that could be included here is the first paragraph you inserted, but even then I would question the encyclopedic value until after the event has occurred (and even then, only if independent sources write about it first). Melcous (talk) 03:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic