Talk:Hefei
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hefei article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article needs a standardised infobox. Blast [improve me] 18.05.07 1447 (UTC)
Help
editIf you live in hefei help me write this article.要是你是从合肥来的,请帮我写这个文jang.宁雨翔 (talk) 16:06, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
- I am also a hefeinese but not live in hefei currently. this article needs some photos of hefei's skyline. panorama of zhengwu district is preferable.--Lastman (talk) 16:22, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
I want to see taiwan as part of china in the map.
editExternal links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Hefei. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130318113757/http://cdc.cma.gov.cn/dataSetLogger.do?changeFlag=dataLogger to http://cdc.cma.gov.cn/dataSetLogger.do?changeFlag=dataLogger
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130318113757/http://cdc.cma.gov.cn/dataSetLogger.do?changeFlag=dataLogger to http://cdc.cma.gov.cn/dataSetLogger.do?changeFlag=dataLogger
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120325041053/http://www.luqyu.cn/tongjishow.asp?tid=1010 to http://www.luqyu.cn/tongjishow.asp?tid=1010
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130405092331/http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjbz/cxfldm/2011/index.html to http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjbz/cxfldm/2011/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:27, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Reverting to last good version
editIn this edit, I reverted to a December version. I'm so sorry, there was a ton of socking that added plenty of copyvio text. If you want to work together to pick through the good edits that did not have anything to do with the offending text, I will help. I'm very sorry. Please yell at me if you object to this big revert. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:06, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Yikes. I was assuming it was mostly translated from the Chinese version of the page, but my Chinese isn't good enough to tell. Can you give some more info on where the copyvio was sourced from? I didn't see any results from the Earwig tool. Thanks — ʀoyoтϵ 07:11, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Royote.
- The first fragment I spot-checked from the very last sock edit of 12:53, 21 January 2018 shows the following:
- I'm not sure why earwig's didn't show much. Please feel free to check that diff and others. I assure you, many, many diffs will be polluted with copy pasting and very close paraphrasing. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:56, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- From that same diff:
- And from the diff right before that:
- I see, thanks. Looks like those sections will need a rewrite. — ʀoyoтϵ 02:08, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Are Urban and Metropolitan reversed?
editFor Hefei the urban area is greater than the metro area and the population density is lower.
Yet, Wikipedia is quite clear that the urban area is the core of a city, and the metro area includes the urban area plus surrounding satellite areas and cities. Consequently the metro surface area must be greater, and the population density would almost always be lower.
Are these numbers reversed?
• Urban 5,670,000 • Urban density 6,800/km2 (18,000/sq mi) • Metro 3,718,000 • Metro density 8,500/km2 (22,000/sq mi) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidRCrowe (talk • contribs) 16:37, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- They are probably from different sources. --Voidvector (talk) 23:44, 10 April 2018 (UTC)