Talk:Hell's Gate National Park

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Former good articleHell's Gate National Park was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 17, 2008Good article nomineeListed
January 24, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

GA Review

edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hell's Gate National Park/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

This article needs significant work before becoming a GA. Here are some of the initial errors I noticed:

Well, i have gotten another reference. feel free to use it as it is already there. It seem svery informative. ~Meldshal42 00:14, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please use this reference . ~Meldshal42 19:56, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I am guessing that in my ref when it says, Altitude-5000 to 7000 feet, it means above sea level? ~Meldshal42 19:57, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Additional comments

I just saw that this article was promoted to Good Article status and I must say that I'm honestly surprised. How can it be considered broad enough in its coverage to fulfill the GA criteria? Who proposed/established the park? Why? Who maintains it? Kenya Wildlife Service? What is the area's climate? Most popular tourist season? How does it take part in wildlife conservation? More information is needed on the early history of the area; the "History" section jumps from a mention of "early humans" (?) to 1981. In comparison to Nairobi National Park, I think the detail is sorely lacking. Some research may answer some of these questions and make the article far more broad in its scope. I also see issues with the prose:

  • "the park" is repetitively used and needs variation
  • Refs go after punctuation and a space must follow
  • Through the park, one can see Hells Gate Gorge lined with red cliffs containing two volcanic plugs - First, "one can see" is unprofessional and sloppy; "the Hells Gate Gorge is visible with ref cliffs..."? Also, nix the dash (-) and use an unspaced em dash per WP:DASH
  • Numbers 0-9 are to be written out per WP:NUMBERS
  • "National Parks" -> national parks

I would have held off on promoting the article. When compared to the other Good Articles from the same category, it seems small, rushed, and unfinished. I do not wish to submit this to GAR so soon after its promotion, but as it stands now I do not think it fulfills the criteria. There's more work that needs doing. María (habla conmigo) 20:45, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Delisted GA

edit

After an assessment, this article was delisted as a Good Article for not being broad enough in coverage, and for the prose not being clear enough. SilkTork *YES! 18:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I haven't been watching this article too closely of late (though it is on my watchlist. I'll make an effort to expand it over the next couple of days, though I honestly don't think there is too much more to be said. ~EDDY (talk/contribs/editor review)~ 21:14, 24 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hell's Gate National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:05, 31 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Page views

edit

Leo1pard (talk) 05:37, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hell's Gate National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:23, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply