Talk:Henry Janzen

Latest comment: 20 days ago by WikiOriginal-9 in topic GA Review
Good articleHenry Janzen has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You KnowIn the news Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 22, 2023Good article nomineeNot listed
October 31, 2024Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 23, 2022.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Henry Janzen was the first coach to lead his team to back-to-back Vanier Cup championships?
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on July 27, 2022.
Current status: Good article
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Henry Janzen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:17, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Henry Janzen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: WikiOriginal-9 (talk · contribs) 13:08, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (No original research):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Notes

edit
  • added kick returner and DB cats
  • do you see any good images of his playing career besides the cards?
  • add CFL to lead perhaps
  • add height and weight
  • infobox says cfl all star but that was West all star per statscrew and 1965 CFL season
  • add 3× to infobox by grey cup
  • add high school to infobox
  • "In 1960" That is linked and so are some other years but I don't think we usually do that.
  • "over the Hamilton Tiger-Cats" remove hamilton
  • "The Winnipeg Blue Bombers made" remove winnipeg
  • "and scored three touchdowns, a career-high" change to "a career-high three touchdowns"
  • add vanier cup to infobox
  • "back-to-back national championships" in lead. perhaps change to vanier cup
  • "As a dependable Canadian back-up" in lead. Was he actually a backup? the body didn't say. I was assuming he was a starter on defense?
  • "retiring in 1966 to accept a position at the University of Manitoba" was that a coaching job
  • "induction to the Manitoba Sports Hall of Fame" hes not on the article for that? also can you include the year
  • "induction to the Winnipeg Blue Bombers Hall of Fame" add year
  • link Regina, Saskatchewan
  • remove refs from lead
  • All-Star is written differently in the lead and body. Use "All-Star" since that's what's in the infobox
  • If Weston Wildcats is a redlink in the body, redlink it in the infobox

That's all I think. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 13:29, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Closed with the nominator BeanieFan11's permission. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:16, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA comments

edit
  • do you see any good images of his playing career besides the cards?
  • add CFL to lead perhaps
    • Done.
  • add height and weight
    • Done.
  • infobox says cfl all star but that was West all star per statscrew and 1965 CFL season
    • Changed.
  • add 3× to infobox by grey cup
    • Done.
  • add high school to infobox
    • Done.
  • "In 1960" That is linked and so are some other years but I don't think we usually do that.
    • Removed year links.
  • "over the Hamilton Tiger-Cats" remove hamilton
    • Done.
  • "The Winnipeg Blue Bombers made" remove winnipeg
    • Done.
  • "and scored three touchdowns, a career-high" change to "a career-high three touchdowns"
    • Done.
  • add vanier cup to infobox
    • Done.
  • "back-to-back national championships" in lead. perhaps change to vanier cup
    • Done.
  • "As a dependable Canadian back-up" in lead. Was he actually a backup? the body didn't say. I was assuming he was a starter on defense?
    • I don't know – that was something someone added years back. Without a source to prove it I removed it.
  • "retiring in 1966 to accept a position at the University of Manitoba" was that a coaching job
    • Clarified in the athletic department (not coaching).
  • "induction to the Manitoba Sports Hall of Fame" hes not on the article for that? also can you include the year
    • Removed, since I'm not completely sure he was inducted.
  • "induction to the Winnipeg Blue Bombers Hall of Fame" add year
    • Added.
  • link Regina, Saskatchewan
  • remove refs from lead
    • Done.
  • All-Star is written differently in the lead and body. Use "All-Star" since that's what's in the infobox
    • Done.
  • If Weston Wildcats is a redlink in the body, redlink it in the infobox
    • Done.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:59, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Henry Janzen/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: BeanieFan11 (talk · contribs) 02:37, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: WikiOriginal-9 (talk · contribs) 04:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

This is a follow up on my prior review. All points have now been addressed. Passing the article. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 04:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.