This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
Hilary Linstead is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original orplagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. GMH Melbourne (talk) 05:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Comment: I just ran earwig and realized that the tool is not picking up copy-and-paste scenarios from Variety anymore, but the main page now shows copy-and-paste scenarios from Deadline. I will work on those real quick. –CaroleHenson (talk) 05:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Comment: How does the article right now? I did the best I could think of without adding more content and sources to set the information apart. –CaroleHenson (talk) 05:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Comment: I posted this on the creator's user talk page:It looks like the biggest problem is list of things, like "writers, directors, composers, choreographers, and cinematographers." which could be summarized to "people in the film industry" - or whatever would be correct for that scenario.There are also hits on the names of works. You're good if it's just one name of a work, but where there are two or more from the same source, you just need to find a way to word it so it doesn't look like a copy-and-paste - perhaps summarizing a bit of information from the source about each of the works and put it in two sentences? Perhaps.I hope that helps. It would be nice to save it, if that's possible, otherwise a tag for copyright violations will probably mean that the draft will be deleted soon.Is this a workable solution GMH Melbourne?–CaroleHenson (talk) 02:47, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply:They may not be online right now, so I am going to make some edits and see how that goes.–CaroleHenson (talk) 03:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Comment: The article seems to be notable. A couple more good-quality sources will help better establish that. But unfortunately, there are just too many long sentences identical from the Variety article. GMH Melbourne (talk) 01:38, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply