Talk:History of Sega/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sjones23 (talk · contribs) 06:18, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   A good rule of thumb is that the lead is to be 3 to 4 paragraphs per WP:LEAD since the article has over 50,000 characters.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   See my comments below.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   y

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Discussion

For criteria 2b and 2c, I'll look into detecting any copyvio problems, all dead citations must be archived or replaced and all live citations have archives in case they go dead. Other than that, there aren't any problems. Any thoughts? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 06:40, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

@Sjones23: You have a fair point on the lead; I'll look at expanding it today. Citations should all be archived; to be sure I ran the IAManagement Bot through it again and looked for missing items. Red Phoenix ^talk 11:24, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Sjones23 As requested, I have expanded the lead. Red Phoenix ^talk 19:03, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Good work. If there's no further objections or concerns, I'll go ahead and pass it. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 19:08, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

No copyvio problems detected on my end. This article is now good to go. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:32, 8 May 2019 (UTC)