Talk:History of the Baháʼí Faith

created and linked from Baha'i Faith

There seemed to be no source for a history page other than the biographical pages and the timeline. This page will reduce the amount of info on the main Baha'i page and can serve as a kind of summary of the biographical pages for the central figures. Also, the biographical pages do not go into any detail that is not about that individual. Cunado19 04:24, 2 August 2005 (UTC)

I copied and pasted from the Baha'i Faith page just so it's not blank. I'm assuming people will delete this and make a real article. Cunado19 01:17, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

Template 'Apostles of Bahá'u'lláh on this page

This template shows 'part of the series'. I feel this is confusing and unlogic. Can it be removed? Wiki-uk 09:02, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

title

Someone changed it to "History of the Baha'i Faith", and I changed it back to "Baha'i history". The move was done without discussion, and there are several pages that follow the same style, Baha'i literature, Baha'i teachings, Baha'is laws, etc. Cuñado - Talk 23:27, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Neutrality

"Note: this page is dedicated to presenting the history of the Bahá'í Faith as understood by Bahá'í historical texts and literature. For dissenting views of succession see Bahá'í divisions."

A short note like this that the page is not going to follow WP:NPOV does not give it license to ignore it. Neitherday 14:50, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Totally agree that the current page is in need of a lot of work. It needs references from sources that are predominiately not Baha'i. I'll work on improving in the next couple of days and removing content which is not neutral. Regards, -- Jeff3000 01:08, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

I've worked on it some, and got some more sections to go. Hopefully I'll get to them in the next couple days. Regards, -- Jeff3000 03:14, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Many years later I am struck with the lack of NPOV here. Abdul Muhib 24 July 2023 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abdul Muhib (talk • contribs) 02:15, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of the Bahá'í Faith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120722083412/http://www.altoona.psu.edu/journals/war-crimes/articles/V1/v1n1a3.pdf to http://www.altoona.psu.edu/journals/war-crimes/articles/V1/v1n1a3.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080815004340/http://www.caucaz.com/home_eng/breve_contenu.php?id=300 to http://www.caucaz.com/home_eng/breve_contenu.php?id=300

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:09, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Merge proposal

Cuñado proposed to merge Baháʼí timeline here. Would he please explain the rationale? – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 11:34, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

• Preliminary oppose the merge until a rationale is given. Also, standalone WP:TIMELINEs are a thing and make poor listspam content in otherwise prose articles. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 11:34, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

If timelines are a thing (see Template:Timelines of religion) then I guess I'll rescind my proposal. I was looking for opportunities to merge and consolidate pages that have sprawled over time. I would vote to delete all the timelines. I'm not sure how they could be useful. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 05:00, 18 January 2021 (UTC)