Talk:History of the Constitution of Brazil

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of the Constitution of Brazil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051109130214/http://www.georgetown.edu/pdba/Constitutions/Brazil/esp88.html to http://www.georgetown.edu/pdba/Constitutions/Brazil/esp88.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:36, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 5 August 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 08:11, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

---

History of the Constitution of Brazil → Constitutional history of Brazil – WP:CONSISTENT with the most articles about other countries in Category:Constitutional history. Waltermaid (talk) 07:50, 5 August 2022 (UTC) WP:STRIKESOCK. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:52, 7 August 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 05:15, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

• Support – but not for the reason given. There's no certainty that categories contain the "correct" articles (however you define that) but more to the point, there is nothing in the article title policy that suggests that categories play a role in determining the correct title for an article. (In particular, the WP:AT § Consistent titling section doesn't, and neither does the WP:MOVE how-to guide.) There are seven articles of the form, "History of the constitution of <Country>" (mostly about Rome), and nineteen of the form "Constitutional history of <Country>". Spot-checking the latter (I looked at Australia, Greece, Turkey, and China) shows that they are about a topic similar to this one, and that does meet WP:CONSISTENT. If the spot-check is representative of all of them, the move should go ahead. Mathglot (talk) 03:23, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

  Striking my support comment for now, changing to No opinion, pending outcome of my investigation into the claims about "most articles about other countries", which may have been the result of the OP having done a dozen or two unilateral page moves of that type. In addition, I would probably hat this whole conversation if I were uninvolved, as it was openned by blocked sock Waltermaid (talk · contribs). Mathglot (talk) 06:24, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

  Striking my 'no opinion' and changing to Procedural close. This move was opened in bad faith by an editor whose account is now globally locked for cross-wiki abuse, after (or maybe, before?) trying the same shenanigans at fr-wiki. If there is a desire to legitimately move this article based on sound principles, it should be made by an editor in good standing, and for policy-based reasons. Mathglot (talk) 10:25, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

• Oppose, see History of the United States Constitution for example. Not sure what consistency OP is referring to. PhotographyEdits (talk) 18:50, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Meaning of metropolitan government

"who were still loyal to the metropolitan government."

Does this mean Portugal, the way the French would use the word "metropolitan"? I apologize if this would be commonly understood. MyIP19216811 (talk) 00:26, 24 July 2024 (UTC)