Talk:History of the New York Giants (1925–1978)

(Redirected from Talk:History of the New York Giants (1925-1978))
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Sd31263 in topic 1946 Bribery scandal
Good articleHistory of the New York Giants (1925–1978) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starHistory of the New York Giants (1925–1978) is part of the History of the New York Giants series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 18, 2007Good article nomineeListed
March 23, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
February 15, 2010Good article reassessmentKept
November 26, 2010Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA

edit

This article is very well written, and it seems that, hands-down, it deserves GA. Well sourced, too. The only problem I have is that you need to include Fair Use Rationales for all the pictures. I see some of the pictures do have a rationale on the picture page, but not on this page. It is a minor detail to me and as long as it gets done fairly soon, I won't remove it from the GA list! Otherwise, great work. Jaredtalk03:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'll get right on it, thanks! Quadzilla99 03:41, 18 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
  Done Quadzilla99 03:51, 18 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Well, not quite. The help page on FURs says that you need to include one of these:
<!-- FAIR USE of IMAGENAME.jpg: see image description page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:IMAGENAME.jpg for rationale -->
after each image in the page that is a fair use image. But it's quick. Just fill it in and slap it in place. Jaredtalk03:53, 18 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
  Done, I'll also add them to MJ as the FAC, even thought it's breezing through now, was extremely contentious before it was re-set and I would hate to have any complaints. Quadzilla99 04:17, 18 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for File:1927Giants.jpg

edit
 

File:1927Giants.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:50, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for File:1934Giants.jpg

edit
 

File:1934Giants.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:59, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

The image File:Miracle at the meadowlands.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:22, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why 1978?

edit

Why is 1978 the cutoff point for this article? It seems to me that 1975, when they moved to a new stadium, would be a more logical cutoff point. I suppose 1978 does mark the low point in the team's history, but they continued to be lousy until the mid-1980s. Timothy Horrigan (talk) 21:51, 20 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

I had to pick a break off point. 1979 is when they hired George Young and drafted Phil Simms. And the owners themselves make it clear that hiring Young was a huge turning point in the history of the franchise:[1] Maybe I can make it more clear somehow. Quadzilla99 (talk) 19:16, 8 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA Sweeps

edit

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. There is a certain amount of link rot, however. I tried to do something about this, but to limited effect. The problem is not serious enough to warrant a delisting, though. Lampman (talk) 16:16, 15 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of the New York Giants (1925–78). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:47, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on History of the New York Giants (1925–78). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:53, 9 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of the New York Giants (1925–78). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:50, 5 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

1946 Bribery scandal

edit

No mention of the bribery scandal that took place prior to the 1946 NFL Championship Game? This hardly seems like a comprehensive Giants history article without mentioning it. Sd31263 (talk) 20:52, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Reply