Talk:Holy Rosary College, Enugu
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Jytdog in topic Contested deletion
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Holy Rosary College, Enugu article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Holy Rosary College, Enugu be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Nigeria may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
![]() | It is requested that a logo be included in this article to improve its quality. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. (May 2016) The Free Image Search Tool may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Contested deletion
editThis page is not unambiguously promotional, because its focus is on the history of the institution. I have placed a search template on the talk page which demonstrates the notability of the topic. The speedy deletion G11 is not applicable because, as it says, "Nor does this criterion apply where substantial encyclopedic content would remain after removing the promotional material;" I removed the tag but the editor who placed it has edit-warred it back on. Andrew D. (talk) 21:09, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for fixing the problem, which was that the article was an unsourced piece of promotion; the sourced stub is kind of appropriate; it is pretty clear that the topic fails WP:NOTABILITY and the current version still doesn't meet the threshold (I have tagged it as such) but this is much better than it was. Going forward please do not remove a speedy tag without providing justification; better yet don't remove a tag trying to fix a blatant problem unless you fix the problem. Jytdog (talk) 21:32, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- The topic is notable and should not have been tagged G11. The main reason that I have knocked it down to a stub is the risk of it containing copyvio – a common problem with articles created by novice editors. But we're good now apart from the notability banner tag which requires evidence as, on the face of it, it appears to be absurd. Andrew D. (talk) 21:40, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- The two refs are passing mentions; notability is not established. As the tag says, "may not meet"... As I noted when i restored the speedy tag, it is not clear what brought you here. I am working through Wikicology's edits and this was something he worked on - he had first userified this and then moved it back into article space (why, i have no idea) Jytdog (talk) 22:23, 6 April 2016 (UTC)