Talk:Homecoming (1996 film)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Homecoming (1996 film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Your information is incorrect. No circus, only one college student.
- The book version has the circus as well. I am pretty sure this was cut out due to time constraints. ≈Alessandro ♫ T • C 03:24, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Infobox and format
editDo not remove the infobox without putting the reason here. Also, the article now looks a MESS. I'm going to try to clean it up a bit. ≈Alessandro ♫ T • C 00:24, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Also, there is not need for this huge summary. It's too much for a Wikipedia page. ≈Alessandro ♫ T • C 00:31, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Extended Summary?
editIs the extended summary really necessary? It reads like a sixth grade book report and is quite detailed for a Lifetime movie. This movie hasn't really gathered much film criticism or discussion, so I don't find it necessary. At the very least, I believe it should be significantly shortened and rewritten. However, I did leave it and just added paragraph breaks so it's at least visibly readable. Also, so those sixth grade plagiarists don't lose points when they print out the summary and turn it in for homework. Sweetbrista (talk) 03:19, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Deletion??
editHow can this page be start class?? It is almost empty. I looked back at previous revisions which had a much more in-depth Plot section, as well as other areas. I am guessing that osmeone deleted these sections. Since i have not actually edited these articles myself, i would like to know if this is in fcat the case before i re-add these areas. Thanks.--Coin945 (talk) 06:40, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
My suspisions are correct. it appeears that User 68.172.224.107 has been slyly deleting entire sections as well as slightly altering other sections of the article. I will add the deleted sections back in.