Talk:LGBTQ rights by country or territory
(Redirected from Talk:Homosexuality laws of the world)
Latest comment: 24 days ago by SafariScribe in topic Requested move 30 September 2024
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the LGBTQ rights by country or territory article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
 | General editors' notes
|
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
 | On 30 September 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from LGBT rights by country or territory to LGBTQ rights by country or territory. The result of the discussion was moved. |
LGBT travel advice focusing on 36 countries
editThe table contains LGBT travel advice focusing on 36 countries.
| Country | Risk level | Caution level |
|---|---|---|
 Algeria |
High risk | No travel allowed |
 Argentina |
No risk | Regular caution |
 Australia |
No risk | Regular caution |
 Austria |
Low risk | Increased caution |
 Bangladesh |
High risk | No travel allowed |
 Brazil |
No risk | Regular caution |
 Canada |
No risk | Regular caution |
 Chile |
No risk | Regular caution |
 China |
High risk | No travel allowed |
 Denmark |
No risk | Regular caution |
 Egypt |
High risk | No travel allowed |
 Finland |
No risk | Regular caution |
 France |
No risk | Regular caution |
 Germany |
Low risk | Increased caution |
 India |
Low risk | Increased caution |
 Indonesia |
High risk | No travel allowed |
 Iran |
High risk | No travel allowed |
 Israel |
No risk | Regular caution |
 Italy |
Low risk | Increased caution |
 Japan |
No risk | Regular caution |
 South Korea |
Moderate risk | Travel reconsidered |
 Mexico |
No risk | Regular caution |
 Netherlands |
No risk | Regular caution |
 Nigeria |
High risk | No travel allowed |
 Norway |
No risk | Regular caution |
 Pakistan |
High risk | No travel allowed |
 Philippines |
Low risk | Increased caution |
 Poland |
Low risk | Increased caution |
 Russia |
High risk | No travel allowed |
 South Africa |
Low risk | Increased caution |
 Spain |
No risk | Regular caution |
 Switzerland |
No risk | Regular caution |
 Thailand |
Low risk | Increased caution |
 Turkey |
High risk | No travel allowed |
 United Kingdom |
Moderate risk | Travel reconsidered |
 United States |
No risk | Regular caution |
For LGBT citizens:
- Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Denmark, Finland, France, Israel, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Switzerland and the United States are no-risk countries, which require them to exercise regular caution when they visit these countries.
- Austria, Germany, India, Italy, the Philippines, Poland, South Africa and Thailand are low-risk countries, which require them to exercise increased caution when they visit these countries.
- South Korea and the United Kingdom are moderate-risk countries, which require them to reconsider travel before visiting these countries.
- Algeria, Bangladesh, China, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Nigeria, Pakistan, Russia and Turkey are high-risk countries, which block travel for them.
As an LGBT citizen:
- Exercise regular caution when you visit Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Denmark, Finland, France, Israel, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Switzerland and the United States due to no risk.
- Exercise increased caution when you visit Austria, Germany, India, Italy, the Philippines, Poland, South Africa and Thailand due to low risk.
- Reconsider travel before visiting South Korea and the United Kingdom due to moderate risk.
- Avoid Algeria, Bangladesh, China, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Nigeria, Pakistan, Russia and Turkey due to high risk.
2603:7000:B500:5D4:2CE3:391E:911A:21C (talk) 18:53, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- What is your point, exactly? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:34, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- My point is that:
- No-risk countries include Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Denmark, Finland, France, Israel, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Switzerland and the United States, requiring LGBT citizens to exercise regular caution when they visit these countries.
- Low-risk countries include Austria, Germany, India, Italy, the Philippines, Poland, South Africa and Thailand, requiring LGBT citizens to exercise increased caution when they visit these countries.
- Moderate-risk countries include South Korea and the United Kingdom, requiring LGBT citizens to reconsider travel before visiting these countries.
- High-risk countries include Algeria, Bangladesh, China, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Nigeria, Pakistan, Russia and Turkey, blocking travel for LGBT citizens.
- 2600:4041:51E1:7000:303C:C8BB:CAEA:3E6D (talk) 23:43, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- I still don't understand what you are asking for. Please see my reply below. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 08:17, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- My point is that:
Information focusing LGBT rights enjoyment or preference and opposition by 36 countries
editThe table contains information focusing LGBT rights enjoyment or preference and opposition by 36 countries.
| Country | LGBT rights enjoyment or preference level | LGBT rights opposition level | LGBT or LGBTQ rights status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Algeria |
— | Mild opposition | Opposing LGBT rights a bit |
| Argentina |
High enjoyment or preference | — | Highly enjoying or preferring LGBT rights |
| Australia |
High enjoyment or preference | — | Highly enjoying or preferring LGBT rights |
| Austria |
Moderate enjoyment or preference | — | Enjoying or preferring LGBT rights |
| Bangladesh |
— | High opposition | Highly opposing LGBT rights |
| Brazil |
High enjoyment or preference | — | Highly enjoying or preferring LGBT rights |
| Canada |
High enjoyment or preference | — | Highly enjoying or preferring LGBT rights |
| Chile |
High enjoyment or preference | — | Highly enjoying or preferring LGBT rights |
| China |
— | Moderate opposition | Opposing LGBT rights |
| Denmark |
High enjoyment or preference | — | Highly enjoying or preferring LGBT rights |
| Egypt |
— | High opposition | Highly opposing LGBT rights |
| Finland |
High enjoyment or preference | — | Highly enjoying or preferring LGBT rights |
| France |
High enjoyment or preference | — | Highly enjoying or preferring LGBT rights |
| Germany |
Moderate enjoyment or preference | — | Enjoying or preferring LGBT rights |
| India |
Mild enjoyment or preference | — | Enjoying or preferring LGBT rights a bit |
| Indonesia |
— | High opposition | Highly opposing LGBT rights |
| Iran |
— | High opposition | Highly opposing LGBT rights |
| Israel |
High enjoyment or preference | — | Highly enjoying or preferring LGBT rights |
| Italy |
Moderate enjoyment or preference | — | Enjoying or preferring LGBT rights |
| Japan |
High enjoyment or preference | — | Highly enjoying or preferring LGBT rights |
| South Korea |
— | Neither enjoying or preferring nor opposing LGBT rights | |
| Mexico |
High enjoyment or preference | — | Highly enjoying or preferring LGBT rights |
| Netherlands |
Moderate enjoyment or preference | — | Enjoying or preferring LGBT rights |
| Nigeria |
— | High opposition | Highly opposing LGBT rights |
| Norway |
Moderate enjoyment or preference | — | Enjoying or preferring LGBT rights |
| Pakistan |
— | High opposition | Highly opposing LGBT rights |
| Philippines |
Mild enjoyment or preference | — | Enjoying or preferring LGBT rights a bit |
| Poland |
Moderate enjoyment or preference | — | Enjoying or preferring LGBT rights |
| Russia |
— | Moderate opposition | Opposing LGBT rights |
| South Africa |
Mild enjoyment or preference | — | Enjoying or preferring LGBT rights a bit |
| Spain |
Moderate enjoyment or preference | — | Enjoying or preferring LGBT rights |
| Switzerland |
Moderate enjoyment or preference | — | Enjoying or preferring LGBT rights |
| Thailand |
Mild enjoyment or preference | — | Enjoying or preferring LGBT rights a bit |
| Turkey |
— | Mild opposition | Opposing LGBT rights a bit |
| United Kingdom |
— | Neither enjoying or preferring nor opposing LGBT rights | |
| United States |
High enjoyment or preference | — | Highly enjoying or preferring LGBT rights |
2603:7000:B500:5D4:2CE3:391E:911A:21C (talk) 19:27, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- What is your point, exactly? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:35, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- My point is that:
- Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Denmark, Finland, France, Israel, Japan, Mexico and the United States enjoy or prefer LGBT rights very much.
- Austria, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Spain and Switzerland enjoy or prefer LGBT rights.
- India, the Philippines, South Africa and Thailand enjoy or prefer LGBT rights a bit.
- Neither South Korea nor the United Kingdom either enjoys or prefers or opposes LGBT rights.
- Algeria and Turkey oppose LGBT rights a bit.
- China and Russia oppose LGBT rights.
- Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Nigeria and Pakistan oppose LGBT rights very much.
- 2603:7000:B500:5D4:68DE:BA26:7A38:9662 (talk) 00:41, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- My point is that:
Information focusing LGBT rights acceptance or support and aversion by 36 countries
editThe table contains information focusing LGBT rights acceptance or support and aversion by 36 countries.
| Country | LGBT rights acceptance or support level | LGBT rights aversion level | LGBT or LGBTQ rights status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Algeria |
— | Mild aversion | A bit averse to LGBT rights |
| Argentina |
High acceptance or support | — | Highly accepting or supporting LGBT rights |
| Australia |
High acceptance or support | — | Highly accepting or supporting LGBT rights |
| Austria |
Moderate acceptance or support | — | Accepting or supporting LGBT rights |
| Bangladesh |
— | High aversion | Highly averse to LGBT rights |
| Brazil |
High acceptance or support | — | Highly accepting or supporting LGBT rights |
| Canada |
High acceptance or support | — | Highly accepting or supporting LGBT rights |
| Chile |
High acceptance or support | — | Highly accepting or supporting LGBT rights |
| China |
— | Moderate aversion | Averse to LGBT rights |
| Denmark |
High acceptance or support | — | Highly accepting or supporting LGBT rights |
| Egypt |
— | High aversion | Highly averse to LGBT rights |
| Finland |
High acceptance or support | — | Highly accepting or supporting LGBT rights |
| France |
High acceptance or support | — | Highly accepting or supporting LGBT rights |
| Germany |
Moderate acceptance or support | — | Accepting or supporting LGBT rights |
| India |
Mild acceptance or support | — | Accepting or supporting LGBT rights a bit |
| Indonesia |
— | High aversion | Highly averse to LGBT rights |
| Iran |
— | High aversion | Highly averse to LGBT rights |
| Israel |
High acceptance or support | — | Highly accepting or supporting LGBT rights |
| Italy |
Moderate acceptance or support | — | Accepting or supporting LGBT rights |
| Japan |
High acceptance or support | — | Highly accepting or supporting LGBT rights |
| South Korea |
— | Neither accepting or supporting nor averse to LGBT rights | |
| Mexico |
High acceptance or support | — | Highly accepting or supporting LGBT rights |
| Netherlands |
Moderate acceptance or support | — | Accepting or supporting LGBT rights |
| Nigeria |
— | High aversion | Highly averse to LGBT rights |
| Norway |
Moderate acceptance or support | — | Accepting or supporting LGBT rights |
| Pakistan |
— | High aversion | Highly averse to LGBT rights |
| Philippines |
Mild acceptance or supporting | — | Accepting or supporting LGBT rights a bit |
| Poland |
Moderate acceptance or support | — | Accepting or supporting LGBT rights |
| Russia |
— | Moderate aversion | Averse to LGBT rights |
| South Africa |
Mild acceptance or supporting | — | Accepting or supporting LGBT rights a bit |
| Spain |
Moderate acceptance or support | — | Accepting or supporting LGBT rights |
| Switzerland |
Moderate acceptance or support | — | Accepting or supporting LGBT rights |
| Thailand |
Mild acceptance or support | — | Accepting or supporting LGBT rights a bit |
| Turkey |
— | Mild aversion | A bit averse to LGBT rights |
| United Kingdom |
— | Neither accepting or supporting nor averse to LGBT rights | |
| United States |
High acceptance or support | — | Highly accepting or supporting LGBT rights |
2603:7000:B500:5D4:2CE3:391E:911A:21C (talk) 19:38, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- What is your point, exactly? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:35, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- My point is that:
- Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Denmark, Finland, France, Israel, Japan, Mexico and the United States accept or support LGBT rights very much.
- Austria, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Spain and Switzerland accept or support LGBT rights.
- India, the Philippines, South Africa and Thailand accept or support LGBT rights a bit.
- Neither South Korea nor the United Kingdom either accepts or supports or is averse to LGBT rights.
- Algeria and Turkey are a bit averse to LGBT rights.
- China and Russia are averse to LGBT rights.
- Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Nigeria and Pakistan are very much averse to LGBT rights.
- 2603:7000:B500:5D4:68DE:BA26:7A38:9662 (talk) 00:42, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is based upon reliable sources, not subjective original analysis by users. Zenomonoz (talk) 01:38, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- I still don't understand what you are asking for. I don't see any tables resembling these in the present article, the only mentions of some of these countries (e.g. Algeria, Bangladesh) are in tables transcluded from e.g. Template:LGBT rights table Africa, Template:LGBT rights table Asia, etc. and concealed inside collapsible boxes within LGBT rights by country or territory#LGBT-related laws by country or territory. Are your tables (i) suggestions for improving existing content; (ii) suggestiond for additional content; or (iii) an analysis of what we presently have in the article? If (i) or (ii), we definitely need reliable sources, per the policies on original research and verifiability; if (iii), see WP:NOTFORUM. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 08:16, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- My point is that:
Requested move 30 September 2024
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 07:32, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
LGBT rights by country or territory → LGBTQ rights by country or territory – per WP:CONSUB and MR/RM discussions and consensus on CfD, Portal, WProject --MikutoH talk! 23:50, 27 September 2024 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). SilverLocust 💬 03:34, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per WP:CONSUB for consistency with LGBTQ.--Trystan (talk) 13:23, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support since that's the title of the LGBTQ page Spookyaki (talk) 00:24, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Politics, WikiProject Law, WikiProject Countries, WikiProject Human rights, WikiProject LGBT studies, and WikiProject Lists have been notified of this discussion. --MikutoH talk! 22:46, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support for the reasons already stated. FiveInParticular (talk) 01:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per the previous discussions and WP:CONSUB — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk) 17:25, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per above. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 17:48, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support as nominated. Raladic (talk) 00:33, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per consub rationale above. Preinstallable (talk) 09:10, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support, but move to LGBTQ+ rights by country or territory and also move LGBTQ to LGBTQ+ INFIYNJTE (talk) 20:46, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.