Talk:Hoollongapar Gibbon Sanctuary
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hoollongapar Gibbon Sanctuary article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Hoollongapar Gibbon Sanctuary has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 27, 2011. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Hoollongapar Gibbon Sanctuary in Assam, India, is named after the only ape in India, the hoolock gibbon? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Hoollongapar Gibbon Sanctuary/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: SMasters (talk) 10:06, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- There were a few punctuation issues which I have fixed. There are a couple of dab links, and the official website is a dead link (not sure if this is temporary). Also, are there any relevant templates that can go at the bottom of the article?
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Article is properly referenced and complies to WP:NPOV.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Question: Is the reserve open to the public? If it is, the article should include something about this.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Article is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- All images check out.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Thanks for doing the review. I have fixed the dab links, added a few more links, added a nav template, commented out the official website (...not sure where it went), and I have have searched unsuccessfully for information about whether the park is open to the public. The only information I can find is on other (unsourced) Wiki articles, but it appears that "wildlife sanctuaries" in India are one step down from national parks. ("Reserved forests" (RFs) are one step down from wildlife sanctuaries.) My guess is that it is open to the public, but as of yet, I haven't found anything to confirm that. Once I get home this evening, I want to review one more source before you possibly pass this article. I just realized that there may be a little bit more information to add. – VisionHolder « talk » 15:02, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
- OK, no problems. – SMasters (talk) 16:23, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
- Alright, I've made some slight additions and adjustments, and I am ready for the GAN to resume. Sorry for not having done all of this before nominating. I completely forgot. – VisionHolder « talk » 01:10, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for fixing all my concerns. I am confident that the article now complies to all the requirements for a GA, and am happy to pass it. Well done. – SMasters (talk) 15:16, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks again for the review! – VisionHolder « talk » 17:20, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for fixing all my concerns. I am confident that the article now complies to all the requirements for a GA, and am happy to pass it. Well done. – SMasters (talk) 15:16, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- Alright, I've made some slight additions and adjustments, and I am ready for the GAN to resume. Sorry for not having done all of this before nominating. I completely forgot. – VisionHolder « talk » 01:10, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hoollongapar Gibbon Sanctuary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721181009/http://wiienvis.nic.in/hoolock_gibbon/assam_2.htm to http://wiienvis.nic.in/hoolock_gibbon/assam_2.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:13, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hoollongapar Gibbon Sanctuary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110728110148/http://threatenedtaxa.org/ZooPrintJournal/2009/November/o221926xi09558-561.pdf to http://threatenedtaxa.org/ZooPrintJournal/2009/November/o221926xi09558-561.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120303214230/http://www.primate-sg.org/PDF/APJ1.2.LorisIndia.pdf to http://www.primate-sg.org/PDF/APJ1.2.LorisIndia.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:37, 6 November 2017 (UTC)