This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bot-created subpage
editA temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Horace Harmon Lurton was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 14:02, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Horace Harmon Lurton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090513215849/http://www.fjc.gov/servlet/tGetInfo?jid=1441 to http://www.fjc.gov/servlet/tGetInfo?jid=1441
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Rank?
editThe information in nthe infobox is first of all confusing , and secondly at odds with that in the text. He was a second lieutenant in 1862, but 2 years later was a private? In the body of the article he is described as having been a sergeant-major. Clarification and/or correction is in order.Toyokuni3 (talk) 04:27, 11 June 2018 (UTC)